Genetic variability, population size and isolation of distinct populations in the freshwater fish Cottus gobio L.

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1625-1632

  Hanfling B ^a,b,c   Brandl, R ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allozymes; Cottidae; Dispersal; Heterozygosity

Indexed keywords

ALLOENZYME; EUROPE; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GERMANY; POPULATION; RIVER;

COTTUS GOBIO;

EID: 0031742025     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00465.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Avise JC, Hamrick JL (1996) Conservation Genetics: Case Histories from Nature. Chapman & Hall, New York.
2. Berge G, Nordal I, Hestmark G (1998) The effect of breeding system and pollination on the genetic variability of small plant populations within an agricultural landscape. Oikos, 81, 17-29.
3. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, London.
4. Downhower JF, Lejeune P, Gaudin P, Brown L (1990) Movements of the Chabot (Cottus gobio) in a small stream. Polski Archiwum Hydrobioligii, 37, 119-126.
5. Eber S, Brandl R (1996) Metapopulation dynamics of the tephritid fly Urophora cardui: evaluation of incidence-function model assumption with field data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 621-630.
6. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology, 10, 1500-1508.
7. Gillespie JH (1991) The Causes of Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
8. Gilpin ME, Diamond JM (1981) Calculation of immigrant and extinction probabilities for individual species: relation to incidence functions and species colonization curves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 78, 392-396.
9. Hänfling B, Brandl R (1998a) Genetic differentiation of the bull-head Cottus gobio L. across watersheds in Central Europe: evidence for two taxa. Heredity, 80, 110-117.
10. Hänfling B, Brandl R (1998b) Genetic and morphological variation in a common European cyprinid, Leuciscus cephalus within and across Central European drainages. Journal of Fish Biology, 52, 706-715.
11. Harris LD (1994) Habitat fragmentation. In: Principles of Conservation Biology (eds Meffe GK, Carroll CR), pp. 237-264. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
12. Harrison S, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR (1988) Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulation model. American Naturalist, 132, 360-382.
13. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Hedrick PW, Gilpin ME (1997) Genetic effective size of a metapopulation. In: Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (eds Hanski IA, Gilipin ME), pp. 165-181. Academic Press Inc., San Diego.
15. Lelek A (1987) The Freshwater Fishes of Europe, Vol. 9. Threatend Fishes of Europe. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
16. Marconato A, Bisazza A (1986) Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Animal Behaviour, 34, 1580-1582.
17. Marconato A, Rasotto MB (1983) Mating preference of the female river bullhead, Cottus gobio (Cottidae, Teleostei). Bolletino Zoologico, 50, 51-54.
18. Nei M, Graur D (1984) Extent of protein polymorphism and the neutral mutation theory. Evolutionary Biology, 17, 73-118.
19. Nei M, Maruyma T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1-10.
20. O'Brien SJ, Roelke ME, Marker L et al. (1985) Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah. Science, 227, 1428-1434.
21. Persat H, Eppe R, Berrebi P, Beadou D (1996) Étude du complexe populationnel de la marge méridionale de Cottus gobio en relation avec l'endémique du Lez Cottus petiti. Determination des entités géographiques et génétiques. Unpublished report to the French Ministery of Environment, University Lyon 1, France.
22. Riffel M, Schreiber A (1995) Coarse-grained population structure in Central European sculpin (Cottus gobio L.): secondary contact or ongoing genetic drift? Journal of Zoology, Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 33, 173-184.
23. Schadt J (1993) Fische, Neunaugen, Krebse und Muscheln in Oberfranken. Vorkommen und Verbreitung als Grundlage für den Fischartenschutz. Regierungsbezirk Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany.
24. Soulé ME (1976) Allozyme variation, its determinants in space and time. In: Molecular Evolution (ed. Ayala FJ), pp. 60-77. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA.
25. Spiess HJ, Spiess R, Waterstraat A (1991) Zur Besiedelung der thüringischen Ulster und ihrer Nebengewässer mit Fischen und wirbellosen Benthosarten. Artenschutzreport, 1, 18-23.
26. Swofford DL, Seiander RB (1989) BIOSYS-1, A Computer Program for the Analysis of Allelic Variation in Population Genetics and Biochemical Systematics. Release 1.7. Illinois Natural History Survey, Illinois.
27. Thienemann A (1950) Verbreitungsgeschichte der Süsswassertierwelt Europas. Die Binnengewässer. Band XVIII. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
28. Waterstraat A (1992) Investigations on the ecology of Cottus gobio L. & other fish species from two lowland streams of Northern Germany. Limnologica, 22, 137-149.
29. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 413-418.