Gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of posterior cruciate retention and substitution

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 310-317

  Ishii, Yoshinori ^a,c   Terajima, Kazuhiro ^a   Koga, Yoshio ^a   Takahashi, Hideaki E ^a   Bechtold, Joan E ^b   Gustilo, Ramon B ^b  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Ishii Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gait analysis; Posterior cruciate ligament retention; Posterior cruciate ligament substitution; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SURGERY; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING SPEED;

EID: 0031741213     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007760050058     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1328-35.
2. Becker MW, Insall JN, Faris PM. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One cruciate retaining and one cruciate substituting Clin Orthop 1991;271:122-4.
3. Berman AT, Zarro VJ, Bosacco SJ, et al. Quantitative gait analysis after unilateral or bilateral total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:1340-5.
4. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a 10-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1713-20.
5. Dorr LD, Ochsner JL, Gronley J, et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retained versus cruciate-sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988;236:36-43.
6. Hara T, Sasagawa K, Koga Y. Development and application of contact pressure distribution measuring system for joint utilizing pressure-sensitive conduction rubber. Proceedings of First World Congress of Biomechanics; August 30-September 4 1990; San Diego, CA.;1:202.
7. Hirsch HS, Lotke PA, Morrison LD. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute? Clin Orthop 1994;309:64-8.
8. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: A modification of the total condylar design. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1317-23.
9. Johnson DP, Eastwood DM. Patellar complications after knee arthroplasty: A prospective study of 56 cases using the Kinematic prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:74-9.
10. Kelman GJ, Biden EN, Wyatt MP, et al. Gait laboratory analysis of a posterior cruciate-sparing total knee arthroplasty in stair ascent and descent. Clin Orthop 1989;248:21-6.
11. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:77-9.
12. Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, et al. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A 10-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:423-31.
13. Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ. The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop 1992;278:147-52.
14. Mokris JG, Smith SW, Anderson SE. Primary total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis total knee arthroplasty system: 3- to 6-year follow-up study of 105 knees. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:91-8.
15. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:397-409.
16. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, et al. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994;309:136-45.
17. Rittman N, Keltelkamp DB, Pryor P, et al. Analysis of patterns of knee motion walking for four types of total knee implants Clin Orthop 1981;155:111-7.
18. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:1163-73.
19. Scuderi GR, Insall JN. The posterior stabilized knee prosthesis. Orthop Clin North Am 1989;20:71-8.
20. Shiavi R, Limbird T, Frazer M, et al. Helical motion analysis of the knee - I: Methodology for studying kinematics during locomotion. J Biomech 1987;20:459-69.
21. Shiavi R, Limbird T, Frazer M, et al. Helical motion analysis of the Knee - II: Kinematics of uninjured and injured knees during walking and pivoting. J Biomech 1987;20:653-65.
22. Simon SR, Trieshmann HW, Burdett RG, et al. Quantitative gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty for monarticular degenerative arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:605-13.
23. Skinner HB, Barrack RL, Cook SD, et al. Joint position sense in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1984;1:276-83.
24. Sledge CB, Walker PS. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop 1984;182:127-36.
25. Stern SH, Insall JH. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of 9-12 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:980-6.
26. Terajima K, Hara T, Koga Y, et al. Development of three-dimensional knee motion analysis system using CR system. Proceedings of 1991 Annual Meeting of Japanese Society for Orthopaedic Biomechanics 1991;13:213-7.
27. Terajima K, Tsuchiya Y, Hara T, et al. Reliability evaluation of three-dimensional knee motion analysis using CR. Proceedings of 1991 Annual Meeting of Japanese Society for Orthopaedic Biomechanics 1991;13:219-23.
28. Townsend MA, Izak M, Jackson RW. Total motion knee gomometry. J Biomech 1977;10:183-93.
29. Vince KG, Insall JN, Kelly MA. The total condylar prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:793-7.
30. Wright J, Weald F, Walker PS, et al. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis: Results after 5-9 years: A follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1003-9.