Digital imaging of black and white photomicrographs: Impact of file size

American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1411-1416

  Barker, Norman J ^a   Zahurak, Marianna ^a   Olson, Jean L ^b   Nadasdy, Tibor ^a   Racusen, Lorraine C ^a   Hruban, Ralph H ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital imaging Photomicrographs; File size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MICROPHOTOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY DISEASES; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOMICROGRAPHY; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0031738999     PISSN: 01475185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199811000-00012     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Cox DR. The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Methuen, 1970.
2. Hartley WG. The Light Microscope: Its Use and Development. Oxford: Senecio; 1996:22-40.
3. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1985.
4. Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corporation. Egret User's Manual. Seattle, Washington: Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corporation; 1988.