Three-dimensional direction and interrelationship of prisms in cuspal and cervical enamel of dog tooth

Anatomical Record

Volumn 252, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 355-368

  Hanaizumi, Yoshinori ^a   Kawano, Yoshiro ^a   Ohshima, Hayato ^a   Hoshino, Masaaki ^a   Takeuchi, Kiichi ^a   Maeda, Takeyasu ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dog tooth; Enamel prism; Hunter Schreger band; Three dimensional reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOG; ENAMEL; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOOTH DEVELOPMENT;

AMELOBLASTS; ANIMALS; CRYSTALLIZATION; CUSPID; DENTAL ENAMEL; DOGS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MASTICATION; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROTOMY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 0031737478     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199811)252:3<355::AID-AR3>3.0.CO;2-E     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Applebaum E. The arrangement of the enamel rods. New York State Dent. J. 1980;26:185-188.
2. Boyde A. The structure and development of mammalian enamel, Ph. D. thesis, University of London, 1964.
3. Boyde A. The development of enamel structure. Proc. Royal Soc. Med. 1967;60:923-928.
4. Boyde A. Correction of ameloblast size with enamel prism pattern: Use of scanning electron microscopy to make surface area measurements. Z. Zellforsch 1969;93:583-593.
5. Boyde A. Airpolishing effects on enamel, dentine and cement. Br. Dent. J. 1983;156:287-291.
6. Boyde A, Fortelius M. Development, structure and function of rhinoceros enamel. Zoo. J. Linn. Soc. 1986;87:181-214.
7. Erausquin J. The aspect of bands of Schreger in horizontal sections of the enamel. J. Dent. Res. 1949:28:195-200.
8. Gilkeson CF, Lester KS. Ultrastructural variation in enamel of Australian marsupials. Scan. Electron Microsc. 1989;3:177-191.
9. Hanaizumi Y, Shimokobe H, Wakita M. The three-dimensional structure of Tomes' processes and their relationship to arrangement of enamel prism in dog teeth. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 1994;57:129-138.
10. Hanaizumi Y, Maeda T, Takano Y. Three-dimensional arrangement of enamel prisms and their relation to the formation of Hunter-Schreger bands in dog tooth. Cell Tissue Res. 1996;286:103-114.
11. Hirota F. Prism arrangement in human cusp enamel deduced by X-ray diffraction. Arch. Oral Biol. 1982;27:931-937.
12. Kallenbach E. Fine structure of secretory ameloblasts in the kitten. Am. J. Anat. 1977;148:479-512.
13. Kawai N. The bands of Schreger observed through the enamel surface. Okajimas Fol. Anat. Jap. 1951;26:25-28.
14. Kawai N. Comparative anatomy of the bands of Schreger. Okajimas Fol. Anat. Jap. 1955;27:115-131.
15. Koenigswald WV, Rensberger JM, Pretzschner HU. Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene mammals allowing increased diet diversity. Nature 1987;328:150-152.
16. Kozawa Y. Comparative Histology of Proboscidean molar Enamel. J. Stomatol Soc. Jap. 1978;45:585-606.
17. Lester KS, Boyde A, Gilkeson C, Archer M. Marsupial and monotreme enamel structure. Scan. Electron Microsc. 1987; 1:401-420.
18. Nishikawa S, Fujiwara J, Kitamura H. Formation of the tooth enamel rod pattern and the cytoskeletal organization in secretory ameloblasts of the rat incisor. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1988;47:222-232.
19. Nishikawa S, Tsukita S, Tsukita S, Sasa S. Localization of adherent junction protein along the possible sliding interface between secretory ameloblasts of the rat incisor. Cell Str. Funct. 1990;15:245-249.
20. Nishikawa S. Correlation of the arrangement pattern of enamel rods and secretory ameloblasts in pig and monkey teeth: A possible role of the terminal webs in ameloblasts movement during secretion. Anat. Rec. 1992;232:466-478.
21. Ohtani O, Ushiki T, Teshima A. Collagen fibrillar networks as skeletal frameworks: A demonstration by cell-maceration/scanning electron microscope method. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 1998;51:249-261.
22. Osborn JW. The nature of the Hunter-Schreger bands in enamel. Arch. Oral Biol. 1965;10:929-993.
23. Osborn JW. Directions and interrelationships of enamel prisms from the sides of human teeth. J. Dent. Res. 1968a; 47:223-232.
24. Osborn JW. Directions and interrelationships of prisms in cuspal and cervical enamel of human teeth. J. Dent. Res. 1968b; 47:395-402.
25. Osborn JW. The mechanism of ameloblasts movement: A hypothesis. Calc. Tiss. Res. 1970;5:344-359.
26. Osborn JW. Variations in the structure and development of enamel. In: Melcher AH, Zard GA, eds. Dental Enamel, Vol. 3. Munksgard, Copenhagen: Oral Science Reviews, 1973.
27. Rensberger JM, Koenigswald MV. Functional and phylogenetic interpretation of enamel microstructure in rhinoceroses. Paleobiology 1980;6:477-495.
28. Shobusawa M. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Form der Schmelzprismen der Saugetiere. Okajimas Folia. Anat. Jpn., 1952; 24:371-392.
29. Skobe Z. Enamel formation in the monkey observed by scanning electron microscopy. Anat. Res., 1977;187:329-334.
30. Stefen C. Differentiations in Hunter-Schreger bands of carnivores. In Koenigswald MV, Sander, PM, eds. Tooth Enamel Microstructure. pp. 123-136, 1997.
31. Sundstrom B. Schreger bands and their appearance in microradiographs of human dental enamel. Acta. Odont. Scand. 1966;24:179-194.
32. Ushiki T, Ide C. Three-dimensional organization of the collagen fibrils in the rat sciatic nerve as revealed by transmission- and scanning electron microscopy. Cell Tissue Res. 1990;260:175-184.
33. Wakita M, Tsuchiya H, Gunji T, Kobayashi S. Three-dimensional structure of Tomes' processes and enamel prism formation in the kitten. Arch. Histol. Jap. 1981;44:285-297.