Perinatal mortality in breech presentation sibships

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 775-780

  Albrechtsen, Susanne ^a,b,c   Rasmussen, Svein ^a,b   Dalaker, Knut ^c   Irgens, Lorentz M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c AKER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NORWAY; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIBLING; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

BREECH PRESENTATION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; LOGISTIC MODELS; NORWAY; NUCLEAR FAMILY; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0031735997     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00307-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Confino E., Gleicher N., Elrad H., Ismajovich B., David M.P. The breech dilemma. A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 40:1985;330-337.
2. Bartlett D., Okun N. Breech presentation A random event or an explainable phenomenon? Dev Med Child Neurol. 36:1994;833-838.
3. Danielian P.J., Wang J., Hall M.H. Long term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term Population based follow up . BMJ. 312:1996;1451-1453.
4. Cheng M., Hannah M. Breech delivery at term A critical review of the literature . Obstet Gynecol. 82:1993;605-618.
5. Hannah M., Hannah W. Caesarean section or vaginal birth for breech presentation at term. BMJ. 312:1996;1433.
6. Notzon F.C., Cnattingius S., Bergsjø P., Cole S., Taffel S., Irgens L., et al. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s International comparison by indication . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 170:1994;495-504.
7. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Dalaker K, Irgens LM. Reproductive career after breech presentation: Continuation rates, interpregnancy interval and recurrence. Obstet Gynecol (in press).
8. Fortney J.A., Higgins J.E., Kennedy K.I., Laufe L.E., Wilkens L. Delivery type and neonatal mortality among 10,749 breeches. Am J Public Health. 76:1986;980-985.
9. Kiely J.L. Mode of delivery and neonatal death in 17587 infants presenting by the breech. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 98:1991;898-904.
10. Thorpe-Beeston J.G., Banfield P.J., Saunders N.J.S. Outcome of breech delivery at term. BMJ. 305:1992;746-747.
11. Greenland S., Neutra R. Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. Int J Epidemiol. 9:1980;361-367.
12. Skjærven R., Wilcox A.J., Lie R.T., Irgens L.M. Selective fertility and the distortion of perinatal mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 128:1988;1352-1363.
13. Rasmussen S., Irgens L.M., Dalaker K. The effect on the likelihood of further pregnancy of placental abruption and the rate of its recurrence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 104:1997;1292-1295.
14. Krebs L., Langhoff-Roos J., Weber T. Breech at term - mode of delivery? A register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 74:1995;702-706.
15. Backe B., Nakling J. Effectiveness of antenatal care A population based study . Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 100:1993;727-732.
16. Albrechtsen S., Rasmussen S., Dalaker K., Irgens L.M. The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967-1994. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 77:1998;410-415.
17. Albrechtsen S., Rasmussen S., Dalaker K., Irgens L.M. Factors influencing delivery method in breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 77:1998;416-421.
18. Albrechtsen S., Rasmussen S., Reigstad H., Markestad T., Irgens L.M., Dalaker K. Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 177:1997;586-592.
19. Bakketeig L.S., Magnus P. Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) definitions and associated risks. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 8:(suppl 1):1992;139-146.