Comparison of CT angiography with MR angiography in the living renal donor

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 2998-3000

  Toki, K ^a   Takahara, S ^a   Kokado, Y ^a   Ichimaru, N ^a   Wang, J ^a   Tsuda, K ^a   Narumi, Y ^a   Nakamura, H ^a   Okuyama, A ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ANGIOGRAPHY; KIDNEY ARTERY; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RENAL ARTERY; RENAL VEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031734435     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-1345(98)00903-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. James FG: Urologie Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991, p 215
2. Pollack H: Clinical Urorography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990, p 2643
3. Cochran ST, Kranskny RM, Danovitch GM, et al: AJR 168:1569, 1997
4. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, et al: Radiology 198:419, 1996
5. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al: Radiology 195:457, 1995
6. Gourlay WA, Yucel EK, Hakaim AG, et al: Transplantation 60:1363, 1995
7. Meyers SP, Talagala SL, Totterman S, et al: AJR 164:117, 1995