Modeling spatial distribution of the unionid mussels and the core-satellite hypothesis

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 7 pt 6, 1998, Pages 73-79

  Lee, Hooi Ling ^a   DeAngelis, Donald ^b   Koh, Hock Lye ^c  

^a Environment Asia   (Malaysia)

^b Department of Biology   (United States)

^c SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Aged structure; Core satellite; Ecological modeling; Environmental restoration; Fish host; Mussel populations

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CORE-SATELLITE HYPOTHESIS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION;

MARINE BIOLOGY;

HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; MOLLUSC; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FISH; HYPOTHESIS; LIFE CYCLE; MUSSEL; NONHUMAN; SPECIES; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALIA; BIVALVIA; MOLLUSCA; UNIONIDAE;

EID: 0031731222     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00609-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Burky, A. J. (1983). Physiological Ecology of Freshwater Bivalve. In: The Mollusca, Russell-Hunter, W. D. (Ed), Vol. 6, Ecology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 281-237.
2. Conrad, T. A. (1834). New Fresh Water Shells of the United States with Colored Illustrations, and a Monograph of the Genus Anculotus of Say also a Synopsis of the American Naiades. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (citation from Davis and Fuller, 1981).
3. Cooper, C. M. (1984). The Freshwater Bivalves of Lake Chicot. An Oxbow of the Mississippi in Arkansas Nautilus, 98, 142-145.
4. Cvancara, A. M. (1972). Lake Mussel Distribution as Determined with Scuba. Ecology, 53, 154-157.
5. Dennis, S. D. (1984). Distributional Analysis of the Freshwater Mussel Fauna of the Tennessee River system, with special reference to possible limiting effects of siltation. Ph.D. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
6. Edgar, A. L. (1965). Observations on the Sperm of the Pelecypod Anodontoides ferussacianus (Lea). Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc., 84, 228-230.
7. Fuller, S. L. H. (1974). Clams and Mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia). In: Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates, Hart, Jr C. W. and Fuller, S. L. H. (Eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 215-273.
8. Hanski, I. (1982). Dynamics of Regional Distribution: The Core and Satellite Species Hypothesis. Oikos, 38, 210-221.
9. Hanski, I. and Gyllenberg, M. (1993). Two General Metapopulation Models and the Core-Satellite Species Hypothesis. American Naturalist, 142(1), 17-41.
10. Jirka, K. J. (1986). Reproduction Biology and Comparative Growth Rates of Selected Species of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia; Unionidae) in the New and Greenbriar Rivers, Virginia and West Virginia. M.S. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
11. Lee, H. L. and DeAngelis, D. L. (1997). A Simulation Study of the Spatio-temporal Dynamics of the Unionid Mussels. To appear in Ecological Modelling.
12. Lee, H. L., DeAngelis, D. L. and Koh, H. L. (1997). Modeling Spatial Distribution of the Unionid Mussels and the Core-Satellite Hypothesis. Technical Report No.M3/97, School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
13. Lewandowski, K. and Stanczykowska, A. (1975). The Occurrence and Role of Bivalves of the Family Unionidae in Mikolajskie Lake. Ekologia Polska, 23(2), 317-334.
14. Machena, C. and Kautsky, N. (1988). A Quantitative Diving Survey of Benthic Vegetation and Fauna in Lake Kariba, a Tropical Man-made Lake. Freshwater Biology, 19, 1-14.
15. McMahon, R. F. (1991). Mollusca: Bivalvia. In: Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Thorp, J. H. and Covich, A. P. (Eds), Academic Press, San Diego.
16. Negus, C. L. (1966). A Quantitative Study of Growth and Production of Unionid Mussels in the River Thames at Reading. Journal Animal Ecology, 35, 513-532.
17. Pennak, R. W. (1953). Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States, Chapter 37, Pelecypoda (Clams, Mussels). Ronald Press, New York.
18. Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon, Oxford.
19. Salmon, A. and Green, R. H. (1983). Environmental Determinants of Unionid Clam Distribution in the Middle Thames River, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61, 832-838.
20. Stansbery, D. H. and Clench, W. J. (1974). The Pleuroceridae and Unionidae of the North Folk Holston River Above Saltville, Virginia. Am. Malacol. Union Inc. Bull., 1973, 33-36.
21. Stein, C. B. (1971). Naiad Life Cycles: Their Significant in the Conservation of the Fauna. In: Proceedings of a Symposium on Rare and Endangered Mollusks (Naiads) of United States, Jorgensen, S. E. and Sharp, R. W. (Eds), Ohio State University, Columbus.
22. Stern, E. M. (1983). Depth Distribution and density of Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) Collected with Scuba from the Lower Wisconsin and St. Croix Rivers. Nautilus, 97, 36-42.
23. Stone, N. M., Earl, R., Hodgson, A., Mather, J. G., Parker, J. and Woodward, F. R. (1982). The Distributions of Three Sympatric Mussel Species (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Budworth Mere, Cheshire. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 48(2), 66-274.
24. Way, C. M., Miller, A. C. and Payne, B. S. (1990). The Influence of Physical Factors on the Distributions and Abundance of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionacea) in the Lower Tennessee River. Nautilus, 103, 96-98.
25. William, C. B. (1950). The Application of Logarithmic Series to the Frequency of Occurrence of Plant Species in Quadrats. Journal of Ecology, 38, 107-138.