Recovery of the human compound action potential following prior stimulation

Hearing Research

Volumn 124, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 182-189

  Murnane, Owen D ^a   Prieve, Beth A ^a   Relkin, Evan M ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Syracuse Institute for Sensory Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Compound action potential; Forward masking; Human; Recovery; Spontaneous rate

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CHILD; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARDRUM; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIALS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; NEURONS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

EID: 0031729586     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00136-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ANSI (1996). American National Standard Specifications for Audiometers. American National Standard Institute, New York.
2. Borg E., Engstrom B., Linde G., Marklund K. Eighth nerve fiber firing features in normal-hearing rabbits. Hear. Res. 36:1988;191-202.
3. Cacace A.T., Margolis R.H., Relkin E.M. Threshold and suprathreshold temporal integration effects in the crossed and uncrossed human acoustic stapedius reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;1255-1261.
4. Coats A.C., Dickey J.R. Postmasking recovery of human click action potentials and click loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52:1972;1607-1612.
5. Delgutte, B., 1987. Peripheral auditory processing of speech information: implications from a physiological study of intensity discrimination. In: Schouten, M.E.H. (Ed.), The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. Nijhof, Dordrecht, pp. 333-353.
6. Evans E.F., Palmer A.R. Relationship between the dynamic range of cochlear nerve fibers and their spontaneous activity. Exp. Brain Res. 40:1980;115-118.
7. Harris D.M., Dallos P. Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. J. Neurophysiol. 42:1979;1083-1107.
8. Kiang, N.Y.S., Watanabe, T., Thomas, E.C., Clark, L.F., 1965. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. MIT Research Monograph No. 35, Technology Press, Boston.
9. Kramer S.J., Teas D.C. Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;795-803.
10. Liberman M.C. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:1978;442-455.
11. Lilly, D.J., Black, F.O., 1989. Electrocochleography in the diagnosis of Meniere's disease. In: Nadol, J.B. (Ed.), Meniere's Disease: Pathogenesis, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Kugler and Ghedini, Berkeley, CA, pp. 369-373.
12. Rabinowitz, W.M., 1977. Acoustic-reflex effects on the input admittance and transfer characteristics of the human middle-ear. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
13. Relkin E.M., Doucet J.R. Recovery from prior stimulation. I: Relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons. Hear. Res. 55:1991;215-222.
14. Relkin E.M., Doucet J.R., Sterns A. Recovery of the compound action potential following prior stimulation: evidence for a slow component that reflects recovery of low spontaneous-rate auditory neurons. Hear. Res. 83:1995;183-189.
15. Sachs M.B., Abbas P.J. Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in the cat: tone-burst stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1974;1835-1847.
16. Salvi, R.J., Perry, J., Hamernik, R.P., Henderson, D., 1982. Relationships between cochlear pathologies and auditory nerve and behavioral responses following acoustic trauma. In: Hamernik, R.P., Henderson, D., Salvi, R. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Raven Press, New York, pp. 165-188.
17. Salvi, R.J., Saunders, S.S., Ahroon, W.A., Shivapuja, B.G., Arehole, S., 1986. Psychophysical and physiological aspects of auditory temporal processing in listeners with noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss. In: Salvi, R.J., Henderson, D., Hamernik, R.P., Colletti, V. (Eds.), Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 179-184.
18. Schmiedt R.A. Spontaneous rates, thresholds, and tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in the gerbil: Comparisons to cat data. Hear. Res. 42:1989;23-36.
19. Schmiedt R.A., Mills J.H., Boettcher F.A. Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers. J. Neurophysiol. 76:1996;2799-2803.
20. Smith R.L. Short-term adaptation in single auditory-nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. J. Neurophysiol. 40:1977;1098-1112.
21. Spoor, A., Eggermont, J.J., Odenthal, D.W., 1976. Comparison of human and animal data concerning adaptation and masking of eighth nerve compound action potential. In: Ruben, R., Elberling, C., Salomon, G. (Eds.), Electrocochleography. University Park, Baltimore, MD, pp. 183-198.
22. Tsuji J., Liberman M.C. Intracellular labelling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections. J. Comp. Neurol. 381:1997;188-202.
23. Viemeister, N.F., 1988. Psychophysical aspects of auditory intensity coding. In: Edelman, G.M., Gall, W.E., Cowan, W.M. (Eds.), Auditory Functions: Neurobiological Bases of Hearing. Wiley, New York, pp. 213-241.
24. Wilson, R.H., Margolis, R.H., 1991. Acoustic-reflex measurements. In: Rintelmann, W.F. (Ed.), Hearing Assessment, 2nd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 247-319.
25. Winslow R.L., Sachs M.B. Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hear. Res. 35:1988;165-190.
26. Winter I.M., Robertson D., Yates G.K. Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory-nerve fibers. Hear. Res. 45:1990;191-202.
27. Young E.D., Sachs M.B. Recovery from sound exposure in auditory-nerve fibers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1973;1535-1543.
28. Zeng F.G., Turner C.W., Relkin E.M. Recovery from prior stimulation. II. Contribution to intensity discrimination. Hear. Res. 55:1991;223-230.