Separate but equal? A system comparison study of MEDLINE's controlled vocabulary MeSH

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 491-495

  Hallett, Karin Schreier ^a  

^a MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIBRARY SCIENCE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM;

EVALUATION STUDIES; MEDLINE; NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE (U.S.); SUBJECT HEADINGS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031724306     PISSN: 00257338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. BAKKER S, BLEEKER A, VAN DER BURG J, DIJKMAN J ET AL. MEDLINE on CD-ROM: a comparison. Online Rev 1989;13(1):39-50.
2. BONHAM MD, NELSON LL. An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1988 Jan;76(1):22-31.
3. DELOZIER EP, LINGLE VA. MEDLINE and MeSH: challenges for end users. Med Ref Serv Q 1992 Fall;11(3):29-46.
4. MCKIBBON KA, HAYNES RB, WALKER DILKS CJ, RAMSDEN MF, ET AL. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? a comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res 1990 Dec;23(6):583-93.
5. SNOW B. MEDLINE subheadings: review and update. Database 1986 Aug;9(4):79-88.
6. SNOW B. MEDLINE subheadings revisited. Database 1986 Oct;9(5):63-71.
7. KWAN J, WATSON JL, DENNEY K. Dialog Medical Connection - an evaluation. Online 1987 Nov;11(6):32-8.
8. HUNTER J. MEDLINE on BRS, Data-Star and Dialog - Does it make a difference? Database 1991 Feb;14(1):43-50.