Oral analogue scale as an outcome measure after displaced intra- articular calcaneal fractures

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 694-697

  Morin, Paul ^a   Buckley, Rick ^b,c   Stewart, Rena ^d   Vande Gutche, Rob ^e  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCANEUS FRACTURE; FOOT INJURY; FRACTURE; FRACTURE TREATMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031723950     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107110079801901008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Au, E., Loprinzi, C.L., Dhodapkar, M., Nelson, T., Novotny, P., Hammack, J., and O'Fallon, J.: Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. J. Clin. Oncol., 12:2751-2755, 1994.
2. Bond, A., and Lader, M.: The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br. J. Med. Psychol., 47:211-218, 1974.
3. Buckley, R.E., and Meek, R.N.: Comparison of open versus closed reduction of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a matched cohort in workmen. J. Orthop. Trauma, 6:216-222, 1992.
4. Chapman, C.R., Casey, K.L., Dubner, R., Foley, K.M., Gracely, R.H., and Reading, A.E.: Pain measurement: an overview. Pain, 22:1-31, 1985.
5. Choinière, M., and Amsel, R.: A visual analogue thermometer for measuring pain intensity. J. Pain Symptom Manage., 11: 299-311, 1996.
6. Downie, W.W., Leatham, P.A., Rhind, V.M., Wright, V., Branco, J.A., and Anderson, J.A.: Studies with pain rating scales. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 37:378-381, 1978.
7. Flandry, F., Hunt, J.P., Terry, G.C., and Hughston, J.C.: Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analogue scales. Am. J. Sports Med., 19:112-118, 1991.
8. Hildebrand, K.A., Buckley, R.E., Mohtadi, N.G.H., and Faris, P.: Functional outcome measures after displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J. Bone Joint Surg., 78B:119-223, 1996.
9. Jensen, M.P., Karoly, P., and Braver, S.: The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain, 27: 117-126, 1986.
10. Littman, G.S., Walker, B.R., and Schneider, B.E.: Reassessment of verbal and visual analogue ratings in analgesic studies. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 38:16-23, 1985.
11. Melzack, R.: The McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain, 1:277-299, 1975.
12. Ohnhaus, E.E., and Adler, R.: Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain, 1:379-384, 1975.
13. Price, D.D., Bush, F.M., Long, S., and Harkins, S.W.: A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical, visual, analogue, and simple numerical rating scales. Pain, 56: 217-226, 1994.
14. Price, D.D., McGrath, P.A., Rafi, A., and Buckingham, B.: The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 17:45-56, 1983.
15. Ware, J.E., and Sherbourne, C.D.: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care, 30:473-483, 1992.