Understanding childhood language disorders

Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 561-566

  Rapin, Isabelle ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; AUTISM; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DYSLEXIA; DYSPHASIA; EPILEPSY; HUMAN; IMAGING; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 0031723504     PISSN: 10408703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008480-199810060-00004     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Hall NE: Developmental language disorders. Semin Pediat Neurol 1997, 4:77-85.
2. Krassowski E, Plante E: IQ variability in children with SLI: implications for use of cognitive referencing in determining SLI. J Commun Disord 1997, 30:1-8.
3. Kristensen H: Elective mutism-associated with developmental disorder/delay. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997, 6:234-239.
4. Tomblin JB, Smith E, Zhang X: Epidemiology of specific language impairment: prenatal and perinatal risk factors. J Commun Disord 1997, 30:325-343.
5. Bishop DV: Pre- and perinatal hazards and family background in children with specific language impairments: a study of twins. Brain Lang 1997, 56:1-26.
6. Tomblin JB, Buckwalter PR: Heritability of poor language achievement among twins. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998, 41:188-199.
7. Tomblin JB, Records NL, Buckwalter P, Zhang X, Smith E, O'Brien M: Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997, 40:1245-1260.
8. Fisher SE, Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins KE, Monaco AP, Pembrey ME: Localisation of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nat Genet 1998, 18:168-170. This exciting study suggests linkage to a particular chromosome of a well-defined subtype of language disorder in the very large family described by Vargha-Khadem et al. (Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:930-933) that has already been the subject of a series of publications. Although DLD is presumed to be genetically heterogeneous and possibly polygenic, this family suggests that in some cases single gene defects may be responsible for DLD. If such a gene is isolated rt may enlighten us about the pathophysiology of such a complex ability as language.
9. Fisher SE, Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins KE, Monaco AP, Pembrey ME: Localisation of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nat Genet 1998, 18:168-170. This exciting study suggests linkage to a particular chromosome of a well-defined subtype of language disorder in the very large family described by Vargha-Khadem et al. (Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:930-933) that has already been the subject of a series of publications. Although DLD is presumed to be genetically heterogeneous and possibly polygenic, this family suggests that in some cases single gene defects may be responsible for DLD. If such a gene is isolated rt may enlighten us about the pathophysiology of such a complex ability as language.
10. Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins K, Alcock K, Fletcher P, Passingham R: Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92:930-933.
11. Ruben RJ: A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997, 117:202-205. A short and thoughtful review of brain plasticity for different aspects of language during development. It uses some studies of changes in the brains of animals deafened at different ages and evidence from the electrophysiological studies by Neville et al. (Brain Lang 1997, 57:285-308; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:922-929) and Mills and Neville (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:125-134), especially those involving deaf and hearing signers, to shed light on the relationship of age at implantation of cochlear prostheses to the development of speech in deaf children.
12. Ruben RJ: A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997, 117:202-205. A short and thoughtful review of brain plasticity for different aspects of language during development. It uses some studies of changes in the brains of animals deafened at different ages and evidence from the electrophysiological studies by Neville et al. (Brain Lang 1997, 57:285-308; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:922-929) and Mills and Neville (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:125-134), especially those involving deaf and hearing signers, to shed light on the relationship of age at implantation of cochlear prostheses to the development of speech in deaf children.
13. Ruben RJ: A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997, 117:202-205. A short and thoughtful review of brain plasticity for different aspects of language during development. It uses some studies of changes in the brains of animals deafened at different ages and evidence from the electrophysiological studies by Neville et al. (Brain Lang 1997, 57:285-308; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:922-929) and Mills and Neville (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:125-134), especially those involving deaf and hearing signers, to shed light on the relationship of age at implantation of cochlear prostheses to the development of speech in deaf children.
14. Ruben RJ: A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997, 117:202-205. A short and thoughtful review of brain plasticity for different aspects of language during development. It uses some studies of changes in the brains of animals deafened at different ages and evidence from the electrophysiological studies by Neville et al. (Brain Lang 1997, 57:285-308; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:922-929) and Mills and Neville (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:125-134), especially those involving deaf and hearing signers, to shed light on the relationship of age at implantation of cochlear prostheses to the development of speech in deaf children.
15. Locke JL: A theory of neurolinguistic development. Brain Lang 1997, 58:265-326.
16. Rapin I: Developmental language disorders: a clinical update. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996, 37:643-655.
17. Conti-Ramsden G, Crutchley A, Botting N: The extent to which psychometric tests differentiate subgroups of children with SLI. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997, 40:765-777.
18. Harel S, Greenstein Y, Kramer U, Yifat R, Samuel E, Nevo Y, Leitner, Kutai M, Fattal A, Shinnar S: Clinical characteristics of children referred to a child development center for evaluation of speech, language, and communication disorders. Pediatr Neurol 1996, 15:305-311.
19. Rapin I, Dunn M: Language disorders in children with autism. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:86-92. This review provides more detailed information on the many aspects of language and communication in individuals in the autistic spectrum than was possible in the current review.
20. Miller JN, Ozonoff S: Did Asperger's cases have Asperger's disorder? A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiat 1997, 38:247-251.
21. Seal BC, Bonvillian JD: Sign language and motor functioning in students with autistic disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 1997, 27:437-466.
22. Dunn M, Gomes H, Sebastian M: Prototypicality of responses in autistic language disordered and normal children in a verbal fluency task. Child Neuropsychol 1996, 2:99-108.
23. Parry-Fielder B, Nolan TM, Collins KJ, Stojevski Z: Developmental language disorder and epilepsy. J Paediatr Child Health 1997, 33:277-280.
24. Tuchman RF: Acquired epileptiform aphasia. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:93-101.
25. Tuchman RF, Rapin I: Regression in pervasive developmental disorders: seizures and epileptiform EEG correlates. Pediatrics 1997, 99:560-566. Tuchman and Rapin review the prevalence of language and autistic regression in a sample of 585 children on the autistic spectrum evaluated prospectively in the office. Parents of 30% of the children reported regression of language, and almost always of sociability and behavior, at a mean age of 21 months. However, age at first visit was over 5 years. Late referral made it impossible to determine how often subclinical epilepsy, which was suspected because 14% of children without clinical seizures had epileptiform electroencephalograms in sleep, may have caused or contributed to the regression. This paper is a wake-up call to pediatricians not to take lightly the report of a toddler's stagnation or regression of language.
26. Neville BG, Harkness WF, Cross JH, Cass HC, Burch VC, Lees JA, Taylor DC: Surgical treatment of severe autistic regression in childhood epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 1997, 16:137-140.
27. Nass R: Language development in children with congenital strokes. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:109-116. This paper illustrates the plasticity of the immature brain. As long as even a large lesion in the infant brain is strictly unilateral, language will develop, but at a cognitive price, the nature of which depends on the side of the lesion. The extreme of this situation is illustrated by hemispherectomy, discussed in by Stark and McGregor (Brain Lang 1997, 60:222-242). Nass points out that the location of early lesions is not a reliable index of the type of language deficit one might have expected from what has been learned from adult aphasia. However there are limits to plasticity, as pointed out by the syndromes of childhood aphasia reviewed by van Hout (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:102-108).
28. Nass R: Language development in children with congenital strokes. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:109-116. This paper illustrates the plasticity of the immature brain. As long as even a large lesion in the infant brain is strictly unilateral, language will develop, but at a cognitive price, the nature of which depends on the side of the lesion. The extreme of this situation is illustrated by hemispherectomy, discussed in by Stark and McGregor (Brain Lang 1997, 60:222-242). Nass points out that the location of early lesions is not a reliable index of the type of language deficit one might have expected from what has been learned from adult aphasia. However there are limits to plasticity, as pointed out by the syndromes of childhood aphasia reviewed by van Hout (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:102-108).
29. Nass R: Language development in children with congenital strokes. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:109-116. This paper illustrates the plasticity of the immature brain. As long as even a large lesion in the infant brain is strictly unilateral, language will develop, but at a cognitive price, the nature of which depends on the side of the lesion. The extreme of this situation is illustrated by hemispherectomy, discussed in by Stark and McGregor (Brain Lang 1997, 60:222-242). Nass points out that the location of early lesions is not a reliable index of the type of language deficit one might have expected from what has been learned from adult aphasia. However there are limits to plasticity, as pointed out by the syndromes of childhood aphasia reviewed by van Hout (Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:102-108).
30. Stark RE, McGregor KK: Follow-up study of a right- and a left-hemispherectomized child: implications for localization and impairment of language in children. Brain Lang 1997, 60:222-242.
31. Martins IP: Childhood aphasias. Clin Neurosci 1997, 4:73-77.
32. Reilly JS, Bates EA, Marchman VA: Narrative discourse in children with early focal brain injury. Brain Lang 1998, 61:335-375.
33. van Hout A: Acquired aphasia in children. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:102-108.
34. Muller R-A, Rothermel RD, Behen ME, Muzik O, Mangner TJ, Chakraborty PK, Chugani HT: Brain organization of language after unilateral lesion: a PET study. Brain Lang 1998, 62:422-451.
35. Lesinski A, Battmer RD, Bertram B, Lennarz T: Appropriate age for cochlear implantation in children-experience since 1986 with 359 implanted children. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1997, 52:214-217.
36. Vasama JP, Makela JP, Pyykko I, Hari R: Abrupt unilateral deafness modifies function of human auditory pathways. Neuroreport 1995, 6:961-964.
37. Neville HJ, Coffey SA, Lawson DS, Fisher A, Emmorey K, BU: Neural systems mediating American sign language: effects of sensory experience and age of acquisition. Brain Lang 1997, 57:285-308.
38. Neville HJ, Bavelier D, Corina D, Rauschecker J, Karni A, Lalwani A, Braun A, Clark V, Jezzard P, Turner R: Cerebral organization for language in deaf and healing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:922-929. This functional MRI study highlights differences in brain organization for language depending on the age at acquisition and modality of the language (acoustic English vs visual Sign) in deaf and hearing subjects. It shows differences in brain activation depending on whether subjects are reading their native language which, be it English or Sign, biases the left hemisphere to mediate language, or they are reading a later acquired language.
39. Mills DL, Neville HJ: Electrophysiological studies of language and language impairment. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:125-134. Electrophysiology (event-related responses to language) shines a strong light on the organization and development of language in the brain of normal children. late speakers, and children with DLD.
40. Leppanen PH, Lyytinen H: Auditory event-related potentials in the study of developmental language-related disorders. Audiol Neurootol 1997, 2:308-340.
41. Fitch RH, Miller S, Tallal P: Neurobiology of speech perception. Ann Rev Neurosci 1997, 20:331-353.
42. Shriberg LD, Aram DM, Kwiatkowski J: Developmental apraxia of speech: III. A subtype marked by inappropriate stress. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997, 40:313-337.
43. Plaza M: Phonological impairment in dyslexic children with and without early speech-language disorder. Eur J Disord Communic 1997, 32:277-290.
44. Leitao S, Hogben J, Fletcher J: Phonological processing skills in speech and language impaired children. Eur J Disord Communic 1997, 32:91-111.
45. Wagner RK, Torgesen JK, Rashotte CA, Hecht SA, Barker TA, Burgess SR, Donahue J, Garon T: Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: a 5-year longitudinal study. Dev Psychol 1997. 33:468-479.
46. Stothard SE, Snowling MJ, Bishop DVM, Chipchase BB, Kaplan CA. Language-impaired preschoolers: a follow-up into adolescence. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998, 41:407-418. The value of this careful study of a cohort of 71 children with DLD identified at age 4 years, reevaluated at school entry (age 5.5 years), and followed into adolescence (age 15-16 years), is to point out to parents and educators that achievement of normal speech does not mean full recovery. Poor language at 5.5 years predicted poor academic outcome, but even children who were speaking normally at 5.5 years had literacy problems.
47. Wright BA, Lombardino LJ, King WM, Puranik CS, Leonard CM, Merzenich MM: Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature 1997, 387:176-178.
48. Cacace AT, McFarland DJ: Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998, 41:355-373.
49. Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Pugh KR, Fulbright RK, Constable RT, Mencl WE, Shankweiler DP, Liberman AM, Skudlarski P, Fletcher JM, Katz L, Marchione KE, Lacadie C, Gatenby C, Gore JC: Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:2636-2641. Functional magnetic resonance imaging illustrates the price dyslexies with inadequate phonologic skills have to pay to read. They expend great effort to read despite their phonological deficit. The consequence is overactivation of Broca's area (inferior frontal gyrus), with associated underactivation of the more posterior brain regions (Wernicke's area) concerned with decoding of the meaning of the written word (semantics).
50. Carson DK, Klee T, Perry CK, Donaghy T, Muskina G: Measures of language proficiency as predictors of behavioral difficulties, social and cognitive development in 2-year-old children. Percept Mot Skills 1997, 184:923-930.
51. Beichtman JH, Brownlie EB, Inglis A, Wild J, Ferguson B, Schachter D, Lancee W, Wilson B, Mathews R: Seven-year follow-up of speech/language impaired and control children: psychiatric outcome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996, 38:1091-1107.
52. Shaywitz BA, Fletcher JM, Shaywitz SE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Adv Pediatr 1997, 44:331-367. Pediatricians who are confused about the relevance of attention-deficit disorder to leaning disability will find this article very helpful.
53. Gaillard WD, Bookheimer SY, Hertz-Pannier L, Blaxton TA: The noninvasive identification of language function. Neuroimaging and rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1997, 8:321-335.
54. Dunn M: Remediation of children with developmental language disorders. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997, 4:135-142. Why expend the effort to go beyond an IQ test to assess children with language disorders and learning disabilities? A neuropsychologic evaluation provides greater depth of understanding of why a child is having trouble in school and a basis for individualized remediation. This is helpful to parents as well as educators and suggests innovative ways to overcome particular barriers to learning.
55. Gierut JA: Treatment efficacy: functional phonological disorders in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998, 41 (suppl):S85-S100.
56. Law J: Evaluating intervention for language impaired children: a review of the literature. Eur J Disord Communic 1997, 32:1-14.
57. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, Schreiner C, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM: Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 1996, 271:81-84.
58. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller SL, Tallal P: Temporal processing deficits in language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 1996, 271:77-81.