Does the World Trade Organization care about ecosystem health? The case of trade in agricultural products

Ecosystem Health

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 92-108

  Buckingham, Donald E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TRADE; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; WTO;

EID: 0031722093     PISSN: 10762825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-0992.1998.00077.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baker, B. (1993) Protection, not protectionism: Multilateral environmental agreements and the GATT. Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 26, 437-468.
2. Belsky, M. (1995) Implementing the ecosystem management approach: Optimism or fantasy? Ecosystem Health 1, 214-221.
3. Brown Weiss, E. (1992) Environment and trade as partners in sustainable development: A commentary. American Journal of International Law 86, 728-735.
4. Brunnée, J. (1995) Towards international ecosystem law? A legal and policy framework for freshwater resources. Ecosystem Health 1, 89-99.
5. Buckingham, D. (1994) A recipe for change: Towards an integrated approach to food under international law. Pace International Law Review 6, 285-321.
6. Callicott, B. (1997) Fallacious fallacies and nonsolutions: Comment on Kristen Shrader-Frechette's ecological risk assessment and ecosystem health: Fallacies and solutions. Ecosystem Health 3, 133-135.
7. Chalifour, N. & Buckingham, D. (1994) Counting chickens before they hatch, new hope or no hope for disciplines in international agricultural trade. Canadian Yearbook of International Law 32, 111-141.
8. Charnovitz, S. (1993a) The environment vs. trade rules: Defogging the debate. Environmental Law 23, 475-517.
9. Charnovitz, S. (1993b) Environmentalism confronts GATT rules: Recent developments and new opportunities. Journal of World Trade 27, 37-53.
10. Forsyth, M. & VanLeeuwen, J. (1997) Making tradeoffs for agroecosystem health. Ecosystem Health 3, 82-93.
11. GATT (1992) International Trade in 1990-91: Volume 1. GATT Publications, Geneva.
12. GATT (1992) Report on Trade and Environment. GATT Doc. 1529. GATT Publications, Geneva.
13. GATT Panel Decision (1991) U.S.-Mexico GATT Panel Report on Tuna and Dolphin (Tuna Dolphin I). International Legal Materiah 30, 1594-1623.
14. GATT Panel Decision (1994) U.S.-European Communities GATT Panel Report on Imports of Tuna (Tuna Dolphin II). International Legal Materials 33, 839-903.
15. Hillman, J. (1997) Non tariff agricultural trade barriers revisited. In: Orden D. & Roberts D. (eds) Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade, pp. 1-32. Department of Applied Economics and the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, St. Paul, MN.
16. Housman, R. & Zaelke, D. (1992) Trade, environment and sustainable development: A primer. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 15, 535-612.
17. International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (1994) The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: An Evaluation. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis, CA. IATRC Paper No. 9.
18. Kettlewell, U. (1992) GATT-Will liberalized trade aid global environmental protection? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 21, 55-76.
19. Lubchenco, J. (1998) Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science 279, 491-497.
20. McDorman, T. (1992) The 1991 U.S.-Mexico GATT Panel Report on Tuna and Dolphin: Implications for Trade and Environment Conflicts. North Carolina Journal of International and Commercial Regulation 17, 461-488.
21. Norton, B. (1997) Relativism, realism and ecological risk: A response to Shrader-Frechette. Ecosystem Health 3, 129-132.
22. Petersmann, E.U. (1993) International trade law and international environmental law: Prevention and settlement of international environmental disputes in GATT. Journal of World Trade 27, 43-81.
23. Rapport, D. (1997a) Taking sustainable development seriously. Ecosystem Health 3, 127-128.
24. Rapport, D. (1997b) Is economic development compatible with ecosystem health? Ecosystem Health 3, 94-106.
25. Rapport, D. (1995) Ecosystem health: Exploring the territory. Ecosystem Health 1, 5-13.
26. Runge, C. et al. (1994) Freer Trade, Protected Environment: Balancing Trade Liberalization and Environmental Interest. Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York.
27. Schoenbaum, T.J. (1997) International trade and protection of the environment: The continuing search for reconciliation. American Journal of International Law 91, 268-313.
28. Schoenbaum, T.J. (1992) Free international trade and protection of the environment: Irreconcilable conflict? American Journal of International Law 86, 700-727.
29. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1997) Ecological risk assessment and ecosystem health: Fallacies and solutions. Ecosystem Health 3, 73-81.
30. Somerville, M. (1995) Planet as patient. Ecosystem Health 1, 61-71.
31. Steinberg, R.H. (1997) Trade-environment negotiations in the EU, NAFTA and the WTO: Regional trajectories of rule development. American Journal of International Law 91, 231-267.
32. Thomas, C. & Tereposky, G. (1993) The evolving relationship between trade and environmental regulation. Journal of World Trade 27, 23-45.
33. U.S. Congress 1995. Global Markets and International Trade Agreements in Agriculture, Trade and the Environment. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
34. Warley, T.K. (1976) Western trade in agricultural products. In: Shonfield, A. (ed) International Economic Relations of the Western World 1959-1971. Volume 1, Royal Institute of International Affairs by Oxford University Press, London. pp. 284-402.
35. World Trade Organization (1996) WTO Focus Vol. 13 (October-November 1996).
36. World Trade Organization (1994) The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Text. Geneva, GATT.
37. WTO Appellate Decision (1998) EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones case - Appeal). AB-1997-4. (Appeal from WT/DS26/R/USA and WT/DS48/R/CAN. Available online at http: //www.wto.org.
38. WTO Panel Decision (1997a) EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones case - Panel E.C./ U.S.) - Complaint by United States. WT/DS26/R/ USA. Available online at http://www.wto.org.
39. WTO Panel Decision (1997b) EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meal Products (Hormones case - Panel E.C./ Canada) - Complaint by Canada. WT/DS48/R/CAN. Available online at http://www.wto.org.