Calculation of benchmark doses for reproductive and developmental toxicity observed after exposure to isopropanol

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 38-44

  Allen, Bruce ^a   Gentry, Robinan ^a   Shipp, Annette ^a   Van Landingham, Cynthia ^a  

^a KS Crump Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 PROPANOL; CARBON DISULFIDE; METHYLMERCURY; NORFLURANE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL TERATOGENESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DOSE CALCULATION; DOSE RESPONSE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATING; MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE DOSE; NONHUMAN; PERINATAL DEATH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0031722053     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1998.1226     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen B., Kavlock R., Kimmel C., Faustman E. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. II. Comparison of generic benchmark dose estimates with no observed adverse effect levels. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 23:1994a;487-495.
2. Allen B., Kavlock R., Kimmel C., Faustman E. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. III. Statistical models. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 23:1994b;496-509.
3. Allen B. C., Strong P. L., Price C. J., Hubbard S. A., Daston G. P. Benchmark dose analysis of developmental toxicity in rats exposed to boric acid. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 32:1996;194-204.
4. Bevan C., Tyler T., Gardiner T., Kapp R., Andrews L., Beyer B. Two-generation reproduction toxicity study with isopropanol in rats. J. Appl. Toxicol. 15:1995;117-223.
5. BIBRA, 1988, A Single Generation Reproduction and Embryotoxicity Study with Isopropyl Alcohol in Rats, The British Industrial Biological Research Association, Carshalton, Surrey.
6. Crump K. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 4:1984;854-871.
7. Crump K. Calculation of benchmark doses from continuous data. Risk Anal. 15:1995;79-89.
8. Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc. 1992, Multi-Generation Rat Reproduction Study with Isopropanol, April 17, 1992.
9. FDRL, 1975, Toxicity Studies in Rats with 2-Butanol including Growth, Reproduction, and Teratologic Observations, Food and Drug Research Laboratories, East Orange, NJ.
10. Gallo M., Oser B., Cox G., Bailey D. Studies on the long-term toxicity of 2-butanol. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 41:1977;135.
11. Gaylor D. Quantitative risk analysis for quantal reproductive and developmental effects. Environ. Health Perspect. 79:1989;243-246.
12. Gaylor D., Slikker W. Jr. Risk assessment for neurotoxic effects. Neurotoxicology. 11:1990;211-218.
13. Harris, S. B. 1995, A review of the EPA comments regarding the study entitled "Multi-generation rat reproduction study with isopropanol."
14. Howe, R. 1984a, THRESH - A computer program to compute a reference dose from quantal animal toxicity data using the benchmark dose method.
15. Howe, R. 1984b, THRESHW - A computer program to compute a reference dose from quantal animal toxicity data using the benchmark dose method.
16. Howe, R. 1984c, THC - A computer program to compute a reference dose from continuous animal toxicity data using the benchmark dose method.
17. Howe, R. 1984d, THWC - A computer program to compute a reference dose from continuous animal toxicity data using the benchmark dose method.
18. Howe, R. Van Landingham, C. 1990, TERALOG - A computer program for assessing risks of reproductive/developmental toxicity.
19. Kavlock R., Allen B., Faustman E., Kimmel C. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. IV. Benchmark doses for fetal weight changes. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 26:1994;211-222.
20. Kimmel C., Gaylor D. Issues in qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for developmental toxicology. Risk Anal. 8:1988;15-21.
21. Lehman A., Schwerma H., Richards E. Acquired tolerance in dogs, rate of disappearance from the blood stream in various species, and effects on successive generations of rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 85:1945;61-69.
22. Pease W., Vandenburg J., Hooper K. Comparing alternative approaches to establishing regulatory levels for reproductive toxicants: DBCP as a case study. Environ. Health Perspect. 91:1991;141-155.
23. Tyl, R. W. 1996, February 12, 1996.
24. Fed. Reg. 50:1986;39426-39436.
25. Fed. Reg. 53:1988a;24850-24969.
26. Fed. Reg. 53:1988b;24834-24847.
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1990, Interim Methods for Development of Inhalation Reference Concentrations, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, August 1990.
28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1992a, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.
29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1992b, July 1, 1992.
30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1993, Background and Quantitative Procedures for Derivation of Inhalation Reference Concentrations, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 1993.
31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1995, The Use of the Benchmark Dose (BMD) Approach in Health Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.