Is it better to avoid urethral catheterization at hysterectomy and caesarean section?

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 315-316

  Barnes, John S ^a  

^a NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE CATHETER;

EID: 0031716892     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb03074.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. The Royal Women's Hospital. Clinical Report, 1992: 31.
2. Mutasim Abubakr Mustafa, Pinkerton JHM. Significant bacteriuria after Major Gynaecological Surgery. Lancet 1968; 1: 839-841.
3. Kingdom JC, Kitchener HC, MacLean AB. Post-operative Urinary Tract Infection in Gynaecology: Implications for an Antibiotic Prophylaxis Policy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 76: 636-638.
4. Buchholz NP, Daly-Grandeau E, Huber-Buchholz MM. Urological Complications Associated with Caesarean Section. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Rcprod Biol 1994; 56: 161-163.
5. Eckenhauser FW, Jonker PL. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Abdominal Hysterectomy, with Special Reference to the Duration of the Prophylaxis. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1990; 12:289-291.
6. Jaffe R, Altaras M, Lobel R, Ben-Aderet N. Single versus multiple-dose Mezlocillin Prophylaxis in Emergency Caesarean Section. Chemotherapy (Switzerland) 1986; 32: 173-177.