A comparison of a non-ionic dimer, iodixanol with a non-ionic monomer, iohexol in low dose intravenous urography

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 71, Issue SEPT., 1998, Pages 910-917

  Skehan, Stephen J ^a,e   Rasmussen, F ^b   Gibney, R G ^a   Lindequist, S ^c   Moller Nielsen, S ^c   Svaland, M G ^d   Kampenes, V B ^d   Bjartveit, K ^d   Greaney, T ^a   Carlsen, S Damgaard ^c   Masterson, J ^a  

^a ST VINCENT S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c Esbjerg Central Hospital   (Denmark)

^d NYCOMED IMAGING AS   (Norway)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE; IODIXANOL; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER DISTENSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FACE EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RASH; VOMITING;

EID: 0031714763     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.849.10195003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sjöberg S, Almén T, Golman K. Excretion of urographic contrast media. I. Iohexol and other media during free urine flow in the rabbit. Acta Radiol 1980;Suppl 362:S93-8.
2. Sjöberg S, Almén T, Golman K. Excretion of urographic contrast media. II. Iohexol and sodium diatrizoate during ureteric stasis in the rabbit. Acta Radiol 1980;Suppl 362:S99.
3. Holtz E, Golman K. Experimental urography with new non-ionic dimeric and monomeric contrast agents. Acta Radiol 1987;Suppl 370:S49-S55.
4. Rasmussen F, Lindequist S, Moller-Nielsen S, Bjartveit K. Renal CT after intravenous injection of non-ionic dimeric or non-ionic monomeric contrast media in healthy volunteers. Acta Radiol 1997;38:61-7.
5. Spataro RF, Fischer HW, Boylan L. Urography with low osrriolality contrast media. Comparative urinary excretion of iopamidol, Hexabrix and diatrizoate. Invest Radiol 1982;17:492.
6. Conroy RM, Bjartveit K, Sheppick A, Long U, Masterson J. lodixanol in intravenous urography: a comparison of iodixanol 270 mgI/ml, iodixanol 320 mgI/ml and iopamidol 300 mgI/ml (Niopam). Clin Radiol 1994;49:337-40.
7. Siegle RL, Gavant ML. Comparison of iodixanol with iohexol in excretory urography. Acad Radiol 1996;3(Suppl 3):S524-7.
8. Sundgren PC, Bååth L, Törnquist C, Hougens Grynne B, Kjaersgaard P, Almen T. Image quality and safety after iodixanol in intravenous urography; a comparison with iohexol. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:699-703.
9. Svaland MG, Haider T, Langseth-Manrique K, Andrew E, Hals PA. Human pharmacokinetics of iodixanol. Invest Radiol 1992;27:130-3.
10. Benness G, Evill C, Wilcox J, Hassann R, Arozoo E. Renal excretion and computed tomography enhancement of iotrolan and iopamidol in dogs. In: Taenzer V, Wende S, editors. Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1989:88-90.
11. Evill CA, Wilcox J, Hassann RM, Benness GT, Arozoo E. Examination of the nephrographic potential of iotrol by computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1988;23:216-20.
12. Naurt C, Mutzel W. Experimental urography in dogs. Diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behaviour of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media. In: Taenzer V, Wende S, editors. Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1989:82-8.
13. McLennan BL, Ling D, Rholl K, James M. Urography with low osmolality contrast agents. Comparison of Hexabrix with Conray 325. Invest Radiol 1986;21:144-50.
14. Grynne BH, Nossen JOØ, Bolstad B, Borch KW. Main results of the first comparative clinical studies on Visipaque. An overview of 18 clinical studies. Acta Radiol 1995;Suppl 339:265-70.
15. Thorstensen O, Albrechtsson U, Calissendorft B, Lárusdóttir H, Norgren L, Tengvar M, et al. lodixanol in femoral angiography. A randomized double-blind, Phase III, parallel study with iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and iohexol 300 mgI/ml. Acta Radiol 1994;35:629-31.
16. Justesen P, Downes M, Grynne BH, Lang H, Rasch W, Seim E. Injection associated pain in femoral angiography; A European multicentre study comparing safety, tolerability and efficacy of iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and iopromide 300 mgI/ml. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997;20:251-6.
17. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to intravenous ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990;175:621-8.
18. Anderssen PE, Bolstad B, Berg KJ, Justesen P, Thayssen P, Kloster Y. Iodixanol and ioxaglate in cardioangiography: A double-blind randomized phase III study. Clin Radiol 1993:48:268-72.
19. Tveit K, Bolz KD, Bolstad B, Haugland T, Berg KJ, Skjserpe T, et al. Iodixanol in cardioangiography. A double-blind parallel comparison between iodixanol 320 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml. Acta Radiol 1994; 35:614-8.
20. Schmiedel E: Evaluation of the adverse effects of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994;18:S104-8.
21. Yamaguchi K, Takanashi I, Kanauchi T, Hoshi T, Kubota H. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1992; 52:1565-70.
22. McCullough M, Davies P, Richardson R: A large trial of intravenous Conray 325 and Niopam 300 to assess immediate and delayed reactions. Br J Radiol 1989;62:260-5.
23. Yoshikawa H. Late adverse reactions to non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 1992;183:737-40.