Cost effectiveness of measures for the reduction of net accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 15, Issue 4-5, 1998, Pages 299-309

  Hektor, Bo ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biomass; CO2 emissions; Cost comparison

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; FOREST; FUEL; GREENHOUSE; REDUCTION; TREE;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; CARBON DIOXIDE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DISTRICT HEATING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORESTRY; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; TAXATION; WOOD FUELS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

BIOMASS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GREENHOUSE GAS; METHODOLOGY; WOODFUEL;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0031712789     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00038-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Anon., Forest absorbing carbon dioxide emissions. Annual reports. FACE Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands, 1993, 1995.
2. Eriksson H. Sources and sinks of carbon dioxide in Sweden. Ambio. 20:(34):1991;151-155.
3. Marklund, L. G., Biomassefuntioner för gran, tall och björk. (English summary) (Biomass functions for spruce, pine and birch), Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences, 1989.
4. Eriksson, L., Lönsammare skogsskötselstrategi i småskogsbruket. (More profitable forest managment in private small-scale forestry) Kungl. Skogs-och Lantbruks-akademins Tidskrift v. 135 (10) 1996.
5. Eriksson, H. and Hallsby, G., Biomass fuels - effects on the carbon dioxide budget. NUTEK R, 1992:10.
6. Rosén, K., Skörd av skogsbränslen i slutavverkning och gallring. (Effects of harvesting of forest fuels in final felling and thinning), Swedish Board of Forestry, 1991.
7. Egnell, et al., Markberedningsförsöket på Mölnafältet 70 år efter markberedning, risavröjning och risgödsling. (The test site for scarification at the Mölna field 70 Years after scarification, residue cleaning, and additional residue application). Arbetsrapporter Nr 77. SLU, Dep. of Silviculture, 1994.
8. Byström S., Lönnstedt L. Waste paper usage and fiber flow in Western Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 15:1995;111-121.
9. Koch, P., Wood versus non-wood materials in U.S. residential construction: some energy-related global implications, Forest Products Journal, 1992, 42(5).
10. Gielen, D., Toward integrated energy and materials policies? Energy Policy, 1995, 23(12).
11. Levander T. The relative contribution to the greenhouse effect from the use of different fuels. Atmospheric Environment. 24A:(11):1990;2707-2714.
12. Hillebrand, K., The greenhouse effects of peat production and use compared with coal, oil, natural gas, and wood, VTT Research notes 1494, Espoo, 1993.
13. Sonesson, U., Energianalyser av biobränslen från höstvete, raps och Salix. (Energy Analysis of Biofuels from Winter Wheat, Rape, and Salix). Report no. 174. Department of Technology in Agriculture, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciencies, 1993.
14. Setzman, E. et al., Miljökonsekvensbeskrivning: ''Från vaggan till graven - fallstudie VEGA'' (English summary). (Environment Impact Analysis: ''From Cradle to Grave - Case Study of the VEGA Project''), Vattenfal U(B), 1993 19.
15. Fors, J. and Nord, B., Energianvändningen inom massa-och pappersindustrin. SCA Nordliner i Munksund. (English summary) (Energy Consumption in the Pulp and Paper Industry). Information no. 174-1980. STU, Stockholm, 1980.
16. Nygaard, J. and Nord, B., Energy input analysis in the pulp and paper industry. Report STU 84/55. STU, Stockholm, 1984.
17. Bohlin F., Eriksson Ljusk-O. Evaluation criteria for carbon dioxide mitigating projects in forestry and agriculture. Energy Conversion and Management. 37:(68):1996;1223-1229.
18. Hall, D. O., Mynick, H. E. and Williams, R. H., Carbon sequestration vs. fossil fuel substitution: alternative roles for biomass in coping with greenhouse warming, 11/90. CEES Report no. 255. Princeton University, 1990.
19. Schmaladinger B., Marland G. The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy. 10:(5/6):1996;275-300.
20. Anon., Energy in Sweden, NUTEK, 1996, Info-333-96.
21. 2 emissions). Paper no. 48. Department of SIMS, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences, 1994.
22. Anon., Virkesbalanser 1992. (Timber balances 1992), Skogsstyrelsen, 1993.