Auditory reaction times in patients with chronic tinnitus with normal hearing

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 611-618

  Nieschalk, Matthias ^a,b   Hustert, Bernhard ^a   Stoll, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory stimuli; Reaction time; Tinnitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REACTION TIME; TINNITUS;

ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHRONIC DISEASE; COCHLEA; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TINNITUS;

EID: 0031712638     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Coles R, Smith P, Davis A. The relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus and its management. In: Berglurd B, Lindval T, eds. Noise as a public health problem. Stockholm: Swedish Concil for Building Research, 1990:87-112.
2. Hazell J. Tinnitus and disability with ageing: adaptation and management. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 1990;476:202-8.
3. Vernon J. Introduction. In: Vernon J, ed. Tinnitus-treatment and relief. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1997.
4. Shulman A. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Shulman A, Aran J, Tonndorf J, et al, eds. Tinnitus, diagnosis/treatment. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1991:237-47.
5. Møller A. Pathophysiology of tinnitus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;93:39-44.
6. Møller A, Möller M, Janetta P, et al. Compound action potentials recorded from the exposed eighth nerve in patients with intractable tinnitus. Laryngoscope 1992;102:187-97.
7. Barnea G, Attias J, Gold S, et al. Tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity: extended high frequency audiometry and auditory nerve brain-stem evoked responses. Audiology 1990;29:36-45.
8. Coles R. Tinnitus and its management. In: Kerr A, Stephens S, eds. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology, Vol. 4. Guilford: Butterworth, 1987:368-414.
9. Jastreboff P. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990;8:221-54.
10. Chocholle R. Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences. Ann Psychol 1940;41:65-124.
11. Fletcher H, Munson W. Loudness, its definition, measurement, and calculation. J Acoust Soc Am 1933;5:82-108.
12. Pfingst B, Hienz R, Kimm J, et al. Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. I. Suprathreshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am 1975;57:421-30.
13. Pfingst B, Hienz R, Miller J. Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing. II. Threshold functions. J Acoust Soc Am 1975;57:431-6.
14. Stebbins W, Miller J. Reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity for the monkey. J Exp Anal Behav 1964;7:309-12.
15. Stebbins W. Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey. J Exp Anal Behav 1966;9:135-42.
16. Moody D. Behavioral studies of noise-induced hearing loss in primates: loudness recruitment. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1973;20:82-101.
17. Chocholle R. Les temps de reaction: leur utilisation possible en audiologie. Ann Oto-Laryngol (Paris) 1954;71:379.
18. Kumpf W. Reaktionszeiten und Fehlverhalten während der Ermittlung der Tonhörschwelle. Laryngol Rhinol 1981;60:259-63.
19. Hustert B, Kumpf W, Stoll W. Reaktionszeiten an der Hörschwelle: Eine Gegenüberstellung von normakusischen und hörgeschädigten Probanden. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1996;75:135-40.
20. Goodwin P, Johnson R. A comparison of reaction times to tinnitus and nontinnitus frequencies. Ear Hear 1980;3:148-55.
21. Attias J, Shemesh Z, Sohmer H, et al. Comparison between self-hypnosis, masking and attentiveness for alleviation of chronic tinnitus. Audiology 1993;32:205-12.
22. Cahani M, Paul G, Shahar A. Tinnitus pitch and acoustic trauma. Audiology 1983;22:357-63.
23. ISO-1999. Acoustics-Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. Geneva: International Standardization Organization, 2nd ed., 1990.
24. Association AS-LH. Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle ear disorders. ASHA 1990;32(Suppl 2): 17-24.
25. Penner M. Variability in matches to subjective tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res 1983;27:247-9.
26. Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus evaluation. In: Shulman A, Aran J, Tonndorf J, et al., eds. Tinnitus, diagnosis/treatment. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1991:293-318.
27. Kumpf W. Die Uhr am audiometer. Laryngol Rhinol 1979; 58:854-60.
28. Chocholle R. Variations des temps de réaction auditifs avec la fréquence. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 1942;136:372-86.
29. Chocholle R. Variations des temps de réaction auditifs avec l'intensité. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 1942;136:334-59.
30. Stebbins W. Response latency as a function of amount of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 1962;5:305-7.
31. Stebbins W, Lanson R. Response latency as a function of reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav 1962;5:299-304.
32. Moody D, Stebbins W, Iglauer C. Auditory generalization gradients for response latency in the monkey. J Exp Anal Behav 1971; 16:105-11.
33. Fozard J, Vercruyssen M, Reynolds S, et al. Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol 1994;49:P179-89.
34. Burke K, Creston J, Shutts E. Hearing loss and reaction time. Arch Otolaryngol 1965;81:49-56.
35. Kiang N, Moxon E, Levine R. Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Wolstenholme G, Knight J, eds. Sensorineural hearing loss. United Kingdom: Churchill, 1970:241-73.
36. Evans E, Borerwe M. Ototoxic effects of salicylates on the responses of single cochlea nerve fibres and on cochlear potentials. Br J Audiol 1982;16:101-8.
37. Jastreboff P, Sasaki C. Salicylate-induced changes spontaneous activity of single units in the inferior colliculus of the guinea-pig. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;80:1384-91.
38. Zenner H, Ernst A. Cochlear-motor, transduction and signal-transfer tinnitus: models for three types of cochlear tinnitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993;249:447-54.
39. Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983;9:79-90.
40. Neely S, Kim D. An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity. Hear Res 1983;9:123-30.
41. Jastreboff P, Hazell W. A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: clinical implications. Br J Audiol 1993;27:7-17.
42. Attias J, Urbach D, Gold S, et al. Auditory event related potentials in chronic tinnitus patients with noise induced hearing loss. Hear Res 1993;71:106-13.
43. Pfefferbaum A, Wenegrat B, Ford J, et al. Clinical application of the P300 component of the event related potentials. II. Dementia, depression and schizophrenia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984;59:104-24.
44. El Massioui F, Lesevre N. Attention impairment and psychomotor retardation in depressed patients: an event-related potential study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;70:46-55.
45. Vernon J. The loudness (?) of tinnitus. Hear Speech Action 1976; 44:17-9.