Socio-economic impact assessment of industrial projects in India

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 27-32

  Ramanathan, R ^a   Geetha, S ^a  

^a INDIRA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Environmental impact assessment; India; Socio economic assessment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT APPRAISAL; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT;

INDIA;

EID: 0031711808     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.1998.10590184     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Interoganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment, 12 (2) 107–152. “Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment
2. Government of India. 1985. Environmental Guidelines for Siting of Industry New Delhi:Government of India. Report of the working group, Ministry of Environment and Forests
3. Indian Institute of Technology. 1993. Status of Environmental Impact Assessment in India New Delhi:Government of India. Bombay, Report prepared for the United Nations Development Programme by the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay through the Ministry of Environment and Forests
4. Victims of Progress”. 1997. The Week, 23:19–22. February
5. Mangkol, P. 1982. “A conceptual development of quantitative environmental impact assessment methodology for decision-makers”. Journal of Environmental Management,:14–307. 301
6. Ramanathan, R, and Muraleedharan, TR. 1994. “The role of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for environmental impact assessment”, Discussion Paper no 111, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Bombay
7. Nag, B, and Ramanathan, R. 1996. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 355–362. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada:Simon Fraser University. “An application of AHP for socioeconomic impact assessment
8. Forum. 1997. Principles for Impact Assessment:the Environmental and Social Dimension London:The Oil International Exploration and Production Forum. Report no 2.74/265
9. Shell. 1996. Social, Cultural and Environmental Setting—The Camisea Project Peru:Shell Prospecting and Development.
10. Peters, D. 1994–95. “Social impact assessment of the Ranomafana National Park Project of Madagascar”. Impact Assessment, 12:385–408.
11. Wood, C. 1995. Environmental Impact Assessment:A Comparative Review Essex, UK:Longman Group Limited.
12. Hills, P, and Ramani, KV. 1990. Energy Systems and the Environment:Approaches to Impact Assessment in Asian Developing Countries Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:Asia Pacific Development Centre.
13. Balagot, B. 1990. Energy Systems and the Environment:Approaches to Impact Assessment in Asian Developing Countries Edited by:Hills, P, and Ramani, KV. 175–209. Kuala Lumpur:Asia Pacific Development Centre. “Tiwi geothermal project:Philippines”, in