Adopting an ecosystem approach: Local variability in remedial action planning

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 465-483

  Kellogg, Wendy A ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen participation; Ecosystem management; Innovation adoption; Remedial action plans

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; REMEDIAL ACTION; WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

GREAT LAKES; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 0031711796     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941929809381095     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baur, E. 1977. Mediating environment disputes. Western Sociology Rev. 8:16-24.
2. Boyer, B. 1988. Remedial action planning and environmental conflict. Paper presented at Conference on Remedial Action Plant Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, September.
3. Boyer, B., and J. McMahon, n.d. “A two-track strategy” for the Buffalo River Remedial Action Plan. Unpublished paper, Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy, SUNY at Buffalo Law School, Buffalo, NY.
4. Burch, W., and D. DeLuca. 1984. Measuring the social impact of natural resource policies. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
5. Burke, C. 1979. Innovation and public policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6. Caldwell, L. 1988. Implementing an ecological systems approach. In Perspectives on ecosystem management for the Great Lakes, ed. L. Caldwell, 1-29. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
7. Dalziel, M., and S. Schoonover, 1988. Changing ways. New York: American Management Association.
8. Department of Environmental Conservation 1986. Water quality regulations: Surface water and ground-water classifications and standards, Part 701.19. Albany, NY.
9. Department of Environmental Conservation. 1989. Buffalo River Remedial Action Plan (draft). Albany, NY.
10. Desveaux, J., E. Lindquist, and G. Toner. 1994. Organizing for policy innovation in public bureaucracy: AIDS, energy and environmental policy in Canada. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 27 (3, September):493-528.
11. Dockstator, J. 1990. The use of public advisory committees in environmental planning: A case study analysis. Uniform Resource Locator: http:freenet.vancouver.bc.ca/loc…/wcel/otherpub/fearo/5151_1-2.html.
12. Donaldson, C. 1989. The Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour: Land use and ecosystem planning perspectives. Handout at Stakeholder Committee meeting. Hamilton, Ontario: RAP Coordinator, Canada Centre for Inland Waters.
13. Elliot, J. 1981. The sociology of natural resources. Toronto: Butterwork.
14. Great Lakes Science Advisory Board. 1978. The ecosystem approach. Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.
15. Great Lakes Science Advisory Board. 1989. Report of the Great Lakes Science Advisory Board to the International Joint Commission. Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.
16. Grima, L. 1985. Participatory rites: Integrating public involvement in environmental impact assessment. Toronto: Institute for Environmental Studies. University of Toronto.
17. Guba, E., and Y. Lincoln. 1982. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication Technol. J./30(winter):233-252.
18. Hall, R. 1987. Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Hartig, J., and N. Law. 1994. Progress in Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans: Implementing the ecosystem approach in Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Document 905-R-24-020. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
20. Hartig, J., and J. Vallentyne. 1989. Use of an ecosystem approach to restore degraded areas of concern in the Great Lakes Basin. Ambio 18(8):423-428.
21. International Joint Commission. 1978. The ecosystem approach. Research Advisory Board Report to the International Joint Commission. Windsor, Ontario.
22. International Joint Commission. 1989. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and 1987 Protocol. Washington, DC and Ottawa, Ontario: International Joint Commission.
23. Kellogg, W. 1993. Ecology and community in the Great Lakes basin: The role of stakeholder and advisory committees in environmental planning processes. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
24. King, N., and N. Anderson. 1995. Innovation and change in organizations. London: Routledge.
25. Kweit, M., and R. Kweit. 1987. The politics of policy analysis: The role of citizen participation in analytic decision making. In Citizen participation in public decision making, eds. J. DeSario and S. Langton, 19-37. New York: Greenwood.
26. Landre, B., and B. Knuth. 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources 6(3):229-257.
27. Landre, B., B. Knuth, and C. O’Neill. 1990. Public participation in Great Lakes Remedial Action Planning. Final Report, New York Sea Grant Extension/College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Applied Research Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
28. Land Use Research Associates. 1986. Hamilton Harbour’s water quality. The stakeholders’ proposals. Toronto, Ontario: LURA.
29. MacKenzie, S. 1993. Ecosystem management in the Great Lakes: Some observations from three RAP sites. Int. J. Great Lakes Res. 19(1):136-144.
30. Ministry of the Environment 1988. Goals, problems and options report. Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
31. Mischer, E. 1986. Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Mohr, L. 1969. Determinants of innovation in organizations. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63:111-126.
33. National Research Council and Royal Society of Canada. 1985. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: An evolving instrument for ecosystem management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Patton, M. 1980. Qualitative evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Peattie, L. 1990. Anthropology and planning. J. Planning Education Res. 9(2): 101-106.
36. Pollution from Land Use Activities Reference Group. 1978. Environmental management strategy for the Great Lakes system. Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.
37. Rogers, E. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. 3d ed. New York: Free Press.
38. Rogers, E., and F. Showmaker. 1971. Communications of innovations. New York: Free Press.
39. Scott, W. 1995. Introduction: Institutional theory and organizations. In The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies, eds. W. Scott and S. Christensen, xi-xx. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Smirich, L. 1985. Is the concept of culture a paradigm for understanding organizations and ourselves? In Organizational culture, ed P. Frost, 55-72. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Spence, W. R. 1994. Innovation: The communication of change in ideas, practices and products. London: Chapman & Hall.
42. Stake, R. 1978. The case study method in social inquiry. Education Rev. (February):5-8.
43. Susskind, L., and J. Cruikshank. 1987. Breaking the impasse. New York: Basic Books.
44. Tong, R. 1985. Ethics in policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Wilkinson, P. 1976. Public participation in environmental management. In Natural resources for a democratic society: Public participation in decision making, eds. A. Utton, W. R. Sewell, and T. O’Riordan, 117-135. Boulder, CO: Westview.
46. Yarbrough, C. 1985. Multi-institutional management: The Green Bay experience. Report to the Great Lakes Science Advisory Board. Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission.
47. Yin, R. 1984. Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48. Zaltman, G., R. Duncan, and J. Holbek, 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.