Concentration-response relationships for fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Anesthesiology

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 852-861

  Thomson, Ian R ^a   Henderson, Blair T ^b   Singh, Karanbir ^b   Hudson, Robert J ^b  

^a ST BONIFACE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cardiac anesthesia; Dose response; Minimum alveolar concentration reduction

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INFUSION PUMP; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMUM LUNG ALVEOLUS CONCENTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

AGED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFUSION PUMPS; ISOFLURANE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SUFENTANIL;

EID: 0031710124     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199810000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cheng DCH, Karski J, Peniston C, Asokumar B, Raveendran G, Carroll J, Nierenberg H, Roger S, Mickle D, Tong J, Zelovitsky J, David T, Sandler A: Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112:755-64
2. Wynands JE, Wong P, Townsend GE, Sprigge JS, Whalley DG: Narcotic requirements for intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1984; 63:101-5
3. Philbin DM, Rosow CE, Schneider RC, Koski G, D'Ambra MN: Fentanyl and sufentanil anesthesia revisited: How much is enough? ANESTHESIOLOGY 1990; 73:5-11
4. Murphy MR, Hug CC Jr: The anesthetic potency of fentanyl in terms of its reduction of enflurane MAC. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1982; 57: 485-8
5. Hall RI, Murphy MR, Hug CC Jr: The enflurane sparing effect of sufentanil in dogs. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1987; 67:518-25
6. McEwan AI, Smith C, Dyar O, Goodman D, Smith LR, Glass PSA: Isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration reduction by fentanyl. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1993; 78:864-9
7. Brunner MD, Braithwaite P, Jhaveri R, McEwan AI, Goodman DK, Smith LR, Glass PSA: MAC reduction of isoflurane by sufentanil. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72:42-6
8. Moon M, Thomson IR, Hudson RJ, Rosenbloom M: Does sufentanil dose influence isoflurane requirements during coronary artery surgery? Can J Anaesth 1996; 43:A28A
9. Scott JC, Cooke JE, Stanski DR: Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: Comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1991; 74:34-42
10. Hudson RJ, Thomson IR, Cannon JE, Friesen RM, Meatherall RC: Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1986; 64:334-8
11. Hudson RJ, Bergstrom RG, Thomson IR, Sabourin MA, Rosenbloom M, Strunin L: Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1989; 70:426-31
12. Hall RI, Schwieger LM, Hug CC Jr: The anesthetic efficacy of midazolam in the enflurane-anesthetized dog. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1988; 68:862-6
13. Schwieger IM, Hall RI, Hug CC Jr: Less than additive antinociceptive interaction between midazolam and fentanyl in enflurane-anesthetized dogs. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1991; 74:1060-6
14. Inagaki Y, Sumikawa K, Yoshiya I: Anesthetic interaction between midazolam and halothane in humans. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 613-7
15. Persson MP, Nilsson A, Hartvig P: Relation of sedation and amnesia to plasma concentrations of midazolam in surgical patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 43:324-31
16. Greenblatt DJ, Allen MD, Locniskar A, Harmatz JS, Shader RI: Lorazepam kinetics in the elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 26:103-13
17. 50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1994; 81:820-8
18. Thomson IR, Peterson MD, Hudson RJ. A comparison of clonidine with conventional preanesthetic medication in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:292-9
19. Roizen MF, Horrigan RW, Frazer BM: Anesthetic doses blocking adrenergic (stress) and cardiovascular responses to incision - MAC BAR. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1981; 54:390-8
20. Glass PSA, Doherty M, Jacobs JR, Goodman D, Smith LR: Plasma concentration of fentanyl with 70% nitrous oxide, to prevent movement at skin incision. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1993; 78:842-7
21. 50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 87:213-27
22. Gepts E, Shafer SL, Camu F, Stanski DR, Woestenborghs R, Van Peer A, Heykants JJP: Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1995; 83:1194-204
23. Henderson BT, Hudson RJ, Thomson IR, Moon M, Peterson MD, Rosenbloom M: Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44:A63B
24. McLain DA, Hug CC: Intravenous fentanyl kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980; 28:106-14
25. Alvis JM, Reves JG, Govier AV, Menkhaus PG, Henling CE, Spain JA, Bradley E: Computer-assisted continuous infusions of fentanyl during cardiac anesthesia: Comparison with a manual method. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1985; 63:41-9
26. Theil DR, Stanley TE III, White WD, Goodman DK, Glass PSA, Bai SA, Jacobs JR, Reves JG: Midazolam and fentanyl continuous infusion anesthesia for cardiac surgery: A comparison of computer-assisted versus manual infusion systems. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993; 7:300-6
27. Glass PSA, Shafer SL, Jacobs JR, Reves JG: Intravenous drug delivery systems. Anesthesia. 4th edition. Edited by Miller RD. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1994, pp 389-416