Use of a consortium to provide continuity in physician training: The OU- COM experience

Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

Volumn 98, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 438-444

  Meyer, Christopher T ^d   Portanova, Ronald ^a   Gevitz, Norman ^a   Dane, Peter ^b   Costello, Walter ^a   Parry, Diane ^a   Brose, Jack ^a   Ross Lee, Barbara ^c  

^a Department of Clinical Research ^*

^b Emergency Medicine

^c Emergency Medicine ^*

^d OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CORE system; Graduate medical education; Osteopathic medical education; Undergraduate medical education

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; REVIEW;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; OHIO; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE;

EID: 0031708852     PISSN: 00986151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Christakis NA. The similarity and frequency of proposals to reform U.S. medical education. JAMA 1995;274:706-11.
2. Enarson C, Burg SD. An overview of reform initiatives in medical education. JAMA 1992; 268:1141-1144.
3. Meyer CT, Portanova R, Riley C, Baker D, Mann MP, Phillips B, Mann D, Smith C, Snyder G, Ross-Lee B, The Ohio Osteopathic Hospital Association, The Ohio Association of Osteopathic Directors of Medical Education, The Ohio Osteopathic Association. The anatomy of an OPTI: Part 2: The CORE system. JAOA 1997; 97:686-691.
4. Bloom SW. Structure and ideology in medical education: An analysis of resistance to change. J Health Soc Behav 1988;29:295-306.
5. Rappleye WC. Medical education: Final report of the Commission on Medical Education. New York: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1932.
6. Weiskotten HU, Schwitalia AM, Cutter WD, Anderson HH. Medical education in the United States 1934-1939. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1940.
7. Coggeshall LT. Planning for medical progress through education. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1965.
8. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Higher Education and the National Health: Policies for Medical and Dental Education. New York: McGraw Hill; 1970.
9. Evaluation of basic science learning: Implications of and for the GAP report. J Med Educ 1974;49:1003-1005.
10. GME Consortia: Changing the Governance of Graduate Medical Education to Achieve Physician Workforce Objectives. Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME). Report of the Work Group on Graduate Medical Education Consortia; 1997.
11. Cantor JC, Cohen AB, Barker DC, Reynolds, RC. Medical educators' views on medical education reform. JAMA 1991;265: 1002-1006.
12. Cox M, Dower C. Graduate medical education consortia: A national survey. Report of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, July 1996.
13. Bing-You RB. Medical students' perceptions of themselves and residents as teachers. Medical Teacher 1992; 14:133-38.
14. Prockop DJ, Prockop MD. Basic science in clinical practice: How much will a physician need to know? Commission on Medical Education: The Sciences of Medical Practice. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; July 1992; pp 51-57.
15. Ginsberg E. The reform of medical education: An outsiders reflection. Acad Med 1993; 68:518-521.