Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 570-577

  Benmalek, A ^a   Sabatier, J P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

^b CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Cross calibration; Densitometry; Lumbar vertebrae

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE MINERAL; CALIBRATION; DATA BASE; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODENSITOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; CHILD; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS;

EID: 0031704384     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001980050101     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Laskey MA, Flaxman ME, Barber RW, et al. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers. Br J Radiol 1991;64:1023-9.
2. Pocock NA, Sambrook PN, Nguyen T, Kelly P, Freund J, Eisman JA. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of Lunar and Hologic instruments. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1081-4.
3. Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR. Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA sytems. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:432-6.
4. Genant HK, Grampp S, Glüer CC, et al. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1503-14.
5. Dequeker J, Pearson J, Reeve J, et al. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration and normative reference ranges for the spine. Results of a European Community concerted action. Bone 1995;17:247-54.
6. Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, Fischer M, Dequeker J, Reeve J. The European Spine Phantom: a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 1995;20:83-92.
7. Pearson I, Dequeker J, Henley M, et al. European semianthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:174-84.
8. Faulkner KG, Glüer CC, Estilo M, Genant HK. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a hologic QDR-1000/W to a QDR-2000. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;52:79-84.
9. Abrahamsen B, Gram J, Hansen TB, Beck-Nielsen H. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements. Bone 1995;16:385-90.
10. Lai KC, Goodsitt MM, Murano R, Chesnut CH III. A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;50:203-8.
11. Sabatier JP, Guaydier-Souquières G, Laroche D, et al. Bone mineral acquisition during adolescence and early adulthood: a study in 574 healthy females 10-24 years of age. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:141-8.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1085-7.
14. Dixon WJ, Massey J. Introduction to statistical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
15. Barnett VD. Simultaneous pairwise linear structural relationships. Biometrics 1969;3:129-142.
16. Glüer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:262-70.
17. Pearson J, Dequeker J, Reeve J, et al. Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur: normal European values standardized with the European Spine Phantom. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:315-23.
18. Steiger P. Standardization of spine BMD measurements [letter]. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1602-3.
19. Hanson J Standardization of femur BMD [letter]. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:500-1.
20. Cornbleet PJ, Gochman N. Incorrect least-square regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis. Clin Chem 1979;25:432-8.
21. Feldman U, Schneider B, Klinkers H, Haeckel R. A multivariate approach for the biometric comparison of analytical methods in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1981;19:121-37.
22. Mallinson T. Comparative calibration, linear relationships and congeneric measurements. Biometrics 1978;34:39-45.
23. Fuller AW. Measurement error models. New York: Wiley, 1987 30-36, 59-70.
24. Pouillès JM, Trémollières F, Ribot C. Perte osseuse vertébrale à la périménopause: résultats d'un suivi longitudinal de 7 ans. Presse Med 1996;25:277-80.
25. Luckey MM, Wallenstein S, Lapinski R, Meier DE. A prospective study of bone loss in African-American and white women: a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:2948-56.