Survival and reproduction of resident and immigrant female root voles (Microtus oeconomus)

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 763-766

  Johannesen, Edda ^a   Andreassen, Harry P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031698158     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-76-4-763     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aars, J., Andreassen, H.P., and Ims, R.A. 1994. The use of fluorescent pigments to establish mother-offspring relationships in small mammals. Mammalia, 58: 649-655.
2. Aars, J., Andreassen, H.P., and Ims, R.A. 1995. Root voles: litter sex ratio variation in fragmented habitat. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 459-472.
3. Bergers, P.J.M., van Apeldoorn R.C., and Bussink, H. 1994. Spatial dynamics of fragmented root vole (Microtus oeconomus) populations: preliminary results. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 20: 101-105.
4. Bondrup-Nielsen, S. 1985. An evaluation of the effects of space use and habitat patterns on dispersal on small mammals. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 22: 385-399.
5. Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R. 1992. Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: populations. Edited by D.R. McCullough and R.H. Barrett. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 16-30.
6. Charlesworth, B. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Cockburn, A. 1992. Habitat heterogeneity and dispersal: environmental and genetic patchiness. In Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. Edited by N.C. Stenseth and W.Z. Lidicker, Jr. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 61-96.
8. Danielson, B.J. 1992. Habitat selection, interspecific interactions and landscape composition. Evol. Ecol. 6: 399-412.
9. Dobson, S.F. 1981. An experimental examination of an artificial dispersal sink. J. Mammal. 62: 74-81.
10. Dunning, J.B., Stewart, D.J., Danielson, B.J., Noon, R.L., Lamberson, R.H., and Stevens, E.E. 1995. Spatially explicit models: current forms and future uses. Ecol. Appl. 5: 3-11.
11. Ims, R.A., Rolstad, J., and Wegge, P. 1993. Predicting space use responses to habitat fragmentation: Can voles Microtus oeconomus serve as an experimental model system for capercaille grouse Tetrao urogallus in boreal forest? Biol. Conserv. 63: 261-268.
12. Ims, R.A. 1994. Litter sex ratio variation in laboratory colonies of two geographically distinct strains of the root vole Microtus oeconomus. Ecography, 17: 141-146.
13. Ims, R.A. 1997. Determinants of geographic variation in growth and reproductive traits in the root vole. Ecology, 78: 461-471.
14. Ims, R.A., and Yoccoz, N.G. 1997. Studying transfer in metapopulations: emigration, migration and colonization. In Metapopulation dynamics: ecology, genetics and evolution. Edited by I. Hanski and M.E. Gilpin. Academic Press, London, pp. 247-265.
15. Isbell, L.A., Chenevi, D.L, and Seyfarth, R. 1993. Are immigrant vervet monkeys, Cercopithecus aethiops, at greater risk of mortality than residents? Anim. Behav. 45: 729-734.
16. Johannesen, E., and Ims, R.A. 1996. Modelling survival rates: habitat fragmentation and destruction in root vole experimental populations. Ecology, 77: 1196-1209.
17. Johnson, M.L., and Gaines, M.S. 1985. Selective basis for emigration of the prairie vole Microtus ochrogaster. open field experiment. J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 399-410.
18. Johnson, M., and Gaines, M.S. 1990. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 449-481.
19. Krebs, C.J. 1992. The role of dispersal in cyclic vole populations. In Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. Edited by N.C. Stenseth and W.Z. Lidicker, Jr. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 160-177.
20. Krebs, C.J. 1994. Ecology, the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York
21. Lebreton, J.D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D.R. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypothesis using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 67-188.
22. Larsen. K.W., and Boutin, S. 1994. Movements, survival, and settlement of red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) offspring. Ecology, 75: 214-223.
23. Leslie, P.H. 1945. On the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika, 33: 183-212.
24. Lomnicki, A. 1978. Individual differences between animals and the natural regulation of their number. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 461-475.
25. Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E., Pollock, K.H., Hinz, R.L., and Link, W.A. 1994. Estimating breeding proportions and testing hypotheses about costs of reproduction with capture-recapture data. Ecology, 75: 2052-2065.
26. Pärt, T. 1991. Philopatry pays: a comparison between collared flycatcher sisters. Am. Nat. 138: 790-796.
27. Pugh, S.R., and Tamarin, R.H. 1991. A comparison of population characteristics and reproductive success of resident and immigrant meadow voles. Can. J. Zool. 69: 2638-2643.
28. Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
29. Roff, D. A. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Chapman and Hall, London.
30. Santos, E.M. dos, Andreassen, H.P., and Ims, R.A. 1995. Differential inbreeding tolerance in two geographically distinct strains of root vole Microtus oeconomus. Ecography, 18: 238-247.
31. Stenseth, N.C. 1983. Causes and consequences of dispersal in small mammals. In The ecology of animal movement. Edited by I.R. Swingland and P.J. Greenwood. Clarendon Press, Oxford. pp. 63-102.
32. Stenseth, N.C., Bondrup-Nielsen, S., and Ims, R.A. 1988. A population dynamics model for Clethrionomys: sexual maturation, spacing behaviour and dispersal. Oikos, 52: 186-193.
33. Tamarin, R.H. 1984. Body mass as a criterion of dispersal in voles: a critique. J. Mammal. 65: 691-692.
34. Wauters, L., Matthysen, E., and Dhondt, A.A. 1994. Survival and lifetime reproductive success in dispersing and resident red squirrels. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34: 197-201.
35. Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Van Horne, B., and Ims, R.A. 1993. Ecological mechanism and landscape ecology. Oikos, 66: 369-380.