Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation: Response to Allendorf et al.

Conservation Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1144-1147

  Wainwright, Thomas C ^a,b   Waples, Robin S ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS;

EID: 0031697625     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97385.x     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Allendorf, F. W., and N. Ryman. 1987. Genetic management of hatchery stocks. Pages 141-159 in N. Ryman and F. Utter, editors. Population genetics and fishery management. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
2. Allendorf, F. W., D. Bayles, D. L. Bottom, K. P. Currens, C. A. Frissel, D. Hankin, J. A. Lichatowich, W. Nehlsen, P. C. Trotter, and T. H. Williams. 1997. Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation. Conservation Biology 11:140-152.
3. Beamish, R. J., and D. R. Bouillon. 1993. Pacific salmon production trends in relation to climate. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1002-1016.
4. Busack, C. A., and K. P. Currens. 1995. Genetic risks and hazards in hatchery operations: fundamental concepts and issues. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15:71-80.
5. Caughley, G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:215-244.
6. Gilpin, M. E., and M. E. Soulé. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Pages 19-34 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
7. Hard, J. J., R. P. Jones, Jr., M. R. Delarm, and R. S. Waples. 1992. Pacific salmon and artificial propagation under the Endangered Species Act. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-2. U.S. Department of Commerce, Seattle.
8. Hindar, K., N. Ryman, and F. Utter. 1991. Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:945-957.
9. Kostow, K., editor. 1995. Biennial report on the status of wild fish in Oregon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland.
10. Lawson, P. W. 1993. Cycles in ocean productivity, trends in habitat quality, and the restoration of salmon runs in Oregon. Fisheries 18(8):6-10.
11. Neave, F. 1953. Principles affecting the size of pink and chum salmon populations in British Columbia. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 9:450-491.
12. Pearcy, W. 1992. Ocean ecology of North Pacific salmonids. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
13. Peterman, R. M. 1989. Review of the components of recruitment in Pacific salmon. American Fisheries Society Symposium 1:417-429.
14. Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 11:559-623.
15. Wainwright, T. C., and R. G. Kope. 1997. Issues and methods of extinction risk assessment for U.S. West Coast salmon. ICES CM 1997/P:16. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen.
16. Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17:8-27.
17. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1997. Wild salmonid policy: draft environmental impact statement. Olympia, Washington.
18. Weitkamp, L. A., T. C. Wainwright, G. J. Bryant, G. B. Milner, D. J. Teal, R. G. Kope, and R. S. Waples. 1995. Status review of coho salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-24. U.S. Department of Commerce, Seattle.