Study for the treatment of phimosis without circumcision in pediatrics: Preputial plasty;Studio per il trattamento della fimosi in eta pediatrica senza circoncisione: La plastica del prepuzio

Minerva Chirurgica

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 561-565

  Pascotto, R ^a   Giancotti, E ^a,b  

^a Unita Operativa di Chir Pediat

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Circumcision; Pediatric surgery; Phimosis, surgery

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CHILD; CIRCUMCISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEALING; HUMAN; INCISION; INFANT; MALE; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PHIMOSIS; PREPUCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PENIS; PHIMOSIS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0031694738     PISSN: 00264733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. Br Med J 1949;2:143.
2. Anderson GF Circumcision. In: Spitz L, editor. Operative Surgery. V Edition Chapman e Hall Medical, 1995, cap 58
3. Richwood AMK, Walker J. Is phimosis over diagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1989,71:275
4. Williams N, Kapila L. Complication of circumcision Br J Surg 1993,80:1231
5. Podestà E, Buffa P, Di Rovasenda E, Scarsi P Ricostruzione del prepuzio nelle ipospadie distali. Rass It Chir Ped 1985;27:273
6. Hinman F Jr. Atlas of pediatric urologic surgery. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. W H Saunders Co Ed., 1994; cap 127.621.