Motion after-effect due to binocular sum of adaptation to linear motion

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 19, 1998, Pages 2963-2971

  Grunewald, Alexander ^a   Mingolla, Ennio ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular motion after effect; Interocular transfer; Monocular motion after effect; Motion after effect; Motion direction; Motion perception; Vector sum

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTEROCULAR TRANSFER; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AFTERIMAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISION TESTS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0031692205     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00102-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Wohlgemuth A. On the after effect of seen movement. B J Psychol (Monogr Suppl). 1:1911;1-117.
2. Mather G. The movement after-effect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception. 9:1980;379-392.
3. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J., van de Grind W.A. Perception of movement and correlation in stroboscopically presented noise patterns. Perception. 14:1985;209-224.
4. Verstraten F.A.J., Fredericksen R.E., van de Grind W.A. Movement after-effect of bi-vectorial transparent motion. Vis Res. 34(3):1994;349-358.
5. Hiris E., Blake R. Another perspective in the visual motion after-effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:1992;9025-9028.
6. Raymond J.E. Movement direction analysers: independence and bandwidth. Vis Res. 33(5/6):1993;767-775.
7. Barlow H.B., Hill R.M. Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature. 200:1963;1345-1347.
8. Grunewald A., Lankheet M.J.M. Orthogonal motion after-effect illusion predicted by a model of cortical motion processing. Nature. 384:1996;358-360.
9. Levinson E., Sekuler R. A two dimensional analysis of direction-specific adaptation. Vis Res. 20:1980;103-107.
10. Patterson R., Bowd C., Phinney R., Pohndorf R., Barton-Howard W.J., Anqilletta M. Properties of the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion after-effect. Vis Res. 34(a):1994;1139-1147.
11. Verstraten F.A.J., Verlinde R., Fredericksen R.E., van de Grind W.A. A transparent motion after-effect contingent on binocular disparity. Perception. 23:1994;1181-1188.
12. Lehmkuhle S.W., Fox R. Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion after-effect. Vis Res. 15:1975;855-859.
13. Lehmkuhle S.W., Fox R. On measuring interocular transfer. Vis Res. 16:1976;428-430.
14. Mitchell D.E., Reardon J., Muir D.W. Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect in normal and stereoblind observers. Exp Brain Res. 22:1975;163-173.
15. Wade N.J. On interocular transfer of the movement after-effect in individuals with and without normal binocular vision. Perception. 5:1976;113-118.
16. Wolfe J.M., Held R. Shared characteristics of stereopsis and the purely binocular process. Vis Res. 23(3):1983;217-227.
17. Anstis S., Duncan K. Separate motion after-effects from each eye and from both eyes. Vis Res. 23(2):1983;161-169.
18. Jiao S.L., Han C., Jing Q.C., Over R. Monocular-contingent and binocular-contingent after-effects. Percept Psychophys. 35(2):1984;105-110.
19. Mingolla E., Grunewald A. Motion after-effects due to interocular summation of adaptation to linear motion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 36(4):1995;54.
20. Raymond J.E. Complete interocular transfer of motion adaptation effects on motion coherence thresholds. Vis Res. 33(13):1993;1865-1870.
21. Nishida S., Ashida H., Sato T. Complete interocular transfer of motion after-effect with flickering test. Vis Res. 34(20):1994;2707-2716.
22. Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychol Rev. 92:1985;173-211.
23. Heeger D.J. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci. 9:1992;181-197.
24. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 195:1968;215-243.