Effects of interview mode on bias in survey measurements of drug use: Do respondent characteristics make a difference?

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 2179-2200

  Rogers, Susan M ^a   Miller, Heather G ^a   Turner, Charles F ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Interview mode; Interviewer administered questionnaires (IAQ); Self administered questionnaires (SAQ); Sensitive behaviors; Survey measurement

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CANNABIS; COCAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG USE; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; GENDER; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RACE; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031688993     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10826089809069820     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AQUILINO, W. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use. Public Opin. Q. 58: 210-240.
2. GOODMAN, L. A. (1971). Partitioning of chi-square, analysis of marginal contingency tables, and estimation of expected frequencies in multidimensional continency tables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66: 339-344.
3. GOODMAN, L. A. (1978). Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
4. MENSCH, B. S., and KANDEL, D. B. (1988). Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort. Public Opin. Q. 52: 100-124.
5. MILLER, H. G., TURNER, C. F., and MOSES, L. E. (Eds.) (1990). AIDS: The Second Decade. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. O'REILLY, J., HUBBARD, M., LESSLER, J., BIEMER, P., and TURNER, C. F. (1994). Audio computer assisted self-interviewing: New technology for data collection on sensitive issues and special populations. J. Off. Stat. 10: 197-214.
7. O'REILLY, J., and TURNER, C. F. (1992). Survey Interviewing Using Audio-Format, Computer-Assisted Technologies. Presentation to the Washington Statistical Society, March 18, 1992.
8. SCHOBER, S. E., FE CACES, M., PERGAMIT, M. R., and BRANDEN, L. (1992). Effect of mode of administration on reporting of drug use in the National Longitudinal Survey. In C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler, and J. C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies (pp. 267-276, DHHS Publication ADM-92-1929). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9. TURNER, C. F., FORSYTH, B. F., LAVANGE, L. M., and BIEMER, P. P. (1993). Survey Measurement of Sensitive Behaviors Using Audio-CASI: Evaluation of a New Technology. Unpublished proposal for funded NIH Grant 1-RO1-HD31067-001. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.
10. TURNER, C. F., KU, L., ROGERS, S. M., LINDBERG, L. D., and SONENSTEIN, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 280: 867-873.
11. TURNER, C. F., LESSLER, J. T., and DEVORE, J. W. (1992). Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler, and J. C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies (pp. 177-211, DHHS Publication ADM-92-1929). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
12. TURNER, C. F., MILLER, H. G., and ROGERS, S. M. (1997). Survey measurement of sexual behaviors: Problems and progress. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Researching Sexual Behavior. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
13. WALLACE, J. M., and BACHMAN, J. G. (1993). Validity of self-reports in student-based studies on minority populations: Issues and concerns. In Drug Abuse among Minority Youth: Methodological Issues and Recent Research Advances (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 130). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
14. WINSHIP, C., and MARE, R. D. (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. Am. Social. Rev. 49: 512-525.