The postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of piroxicam (FDDF) and naproxen sodium

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 21-29

  Selcuk E ^a,b   Gomel, M ^a   Apaydin, S ^a   Kose T ^a   Tuglular, I ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Ctr Drug R D Pharmacokinetic A ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANAPROTAB; NAPROXEN; PIROXICAM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANALGESIC ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; NAUSEA; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALGESICS; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NAPROXEN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PIROXICAM; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 0031686452     PISSN: 02511649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Parsloe M., et al, Premedication with piroxicam-FDDF in patients having dental surgery under general anaesthesia with halothane or isoflurane. Br. J. Anaesth., 61, 702, 1988.
2. Seymour R.A., Blair G.S., Wyatt F.A.R. Postoperative dental pain and analgesic efficacy. Parts 1 & 2. Br. J. Oral Surg., 21, 290, 1983.
3. Seymour R.A., Walton J.G. Pain control after third molar surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 13, 457, 1984.
4. Chapnick P., Baker G., Munroe C.O. Bupivacaine anaesthesia in oral surgery. J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 7, 441, 1980.
5. Hanks G.W., et al. Controlled release morphine tablets. A double-blind trial in dental surgery patients. Br. J. Anaesth., 53, 1259, 1980
6. Rondeau P.L, Yeung E., Nelson P. Dental surgery pain and analgesia. J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 7, 433, 1980.
7. Smith M.T., et al. Acetaminophen extra strength capsules versus propoxyphene compound-65 versus placebo: a double-blind study of effectiveness and safety. Curr. Ther. Res., 17, 452, 1975.
8. Seymour R.A. Use of analgesics in postoperative dental pain: a review. J. Roy. Soc. Med., 949, 1984.
9. Hutchison G.L., Crofts S.L., Gray I.G. Preoperative piroxicam-FDDF for postoperative analgesia in dental surgery. Br. J. Anaesth., 65, 500, 1990.
10. Manso F.J., Bascones A. Estudio comparative sobre la eficacia y tolerancia de piroxicam-FDDF vs. Metamizol en el tratamiento del dolor postextraccion quirurgica de molares. Avances en odontoestomatologia, 11, 9, 1995.
11. Ohnishi M., Kawai T., Ogawa N. Double-blind evaluation of piroxicam-FDDF and indomethacin in the treatment of inflammation following oral surgery. Eur. J. Rheum, Inflam., 6, 259, 1983.
12. th ed. Goodman and Gilman, New York 1996, p641.
13. Wakeling H.G., Barry P.C. Postoperative analgesia in dental day case surgery, a comparison between Feldene "Melt" (piroxicam-FDDF) and diclofenac suppositories Anaesthesia, 51, 784, 1996.
14. Dolci G., Ripari M., Pacifici L. Sublingual piroxicam-FDDF tablets. Dental Cosmos, 8, 48, 1993.
15. Chlud K., Pangerl S. Comparison of naproxen and piroxicam-FDDF in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a doubleblind, crossover study. Pharmacotherapeutica, 4(2), 113, 1985.
16. Moyer S. Pharmacokinetics of naproxen sodium. Cephalalgia, Suppl 4, 77, 1986.
17. Sevelius H., et al. Bioavailability of naproxen sodium and its relationship to clinical analgesic effects. Br J. Clin. PharmaCol., 10, 259, 1980.
18. Todd P.A., Clissold S.P. Naproxen, a reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs, 40(1), 91, 1990.
19. Clark M.S., et al. A double-blind single dose evaluation of the relative analgesic efficacy and safety of carprofen in the treatment of postoperative pain after oral surgery. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 68, 273, 1989.
20. Giglio J.A., Laskin D.M. Double-blind comparison of meclofenamate sodium plus codeine, meclofenamate sodium, codeine and placebo for relief of pain following surgical removal of third molars. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 48, 785, 1990.
21. Forbes J.A. 12-hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, aspirin and placebo in pain after oral surgery. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther, 25, 225, 1979.
22. Mardirossian G., Cooper S.A. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen and aspirin for postsurgical dental pain. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 43, 106, 1985.
23. Nystrom E., Gustaffson I., Quiding B. The pain intensity at analgesic intake and the efficacy of diflunisal in single doses and effervescent acetaminophen in single and repeated doses. Pharmacotherapy, 8, 201, 1988.
24. Seymour R.A., Rawlins M.D. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of aspirin in postoperative dental pain. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 13, 807, 1982.
25. Selçuk E., et al. Comparison of the analgesic effects of diflunisal and paracetamol in the treatment of postoperative dental pain. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. Res., 16(2/3), 57, 1996.
26. Patel A., Kohn H., Preiskel H.W. Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic effects of single doses of lornoxicam and aspirin in patients with postoperative dental pain. Br. Dent. J., 170, 295, 1991.
27. Petersen U.K., Hansson F., Strid S. The effect of an ibuprofen codeine combination for the treatment of patients with pain after removal of lower third molars. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 51, 637, 1993.
28. Hobbs D.C. Piroxicam pharmacokinetics: recent clinical results relative kinetics and plasma levels to age, sex and adverse effects. Am. J. Med., 81, Suppl 5B, 22, 1986.