Assessment of a new through-the-eyelid technique for 'A' scan ultrasound ocular axial length measurement

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 408-414

  Laws, Fiona ^a   Laws, David ^a   Wood, Ivan ^b   Clark, David ^a  

^a WALTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CORNEA; EYELID; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; ULTRASOUND;

ANISOTROPY; CORNEA; EYE; EYELIDS; HUMANS; OPTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031684941     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0275-5408(98)00009-X     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Binkhorst R. D. Dioptienzahl kunstlicher Augenlinsen. Klin. Monatsbl.-Augenheilkd. 162:1973;354-361.
2. Binkhorst R. D. Intraocular lens power calculation. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 19:1979;83-94.
3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. i:1986;307-310.
4. Erhlers N., Sorensen T., Bramsen T., Holk Poulsen H. Central corneal thicknesss in newborns and children. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.). 65:1976;579-584.
5. Epstein I., Geerats W. On the determination of the power of the lens inplant. Am. Intra-Oc. Implant Soc. J. 3:1977;87-90.
6. Fleidelus H. C., Albirk P. H., Goldschmidt E. Intraocular lenses calculation. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.). 65:1987;579-584.
7. Giers U., Epple C. The reliability of ultrasound biometry. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 196:(3):1990;171-178.
8. Harayama K., Ameniya T., Nishimura H. Development of the eyeball during fetal life. J. Ped. Ophthalmol. and Strab. 18:(4):1981;37-40.
9. Larsen J. The sagittal growth of the eye I. Ultrasonic measurement of the depth of the anterior chamber from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmologica. 49:1971;239-262.
10. Larsen J. The sagittal growth of the eye II. Ultrasonic measurement of the axial diameter of the lens and the anterior segment from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmologica. 49:1971;427-453.
11. Larsen J. The sagittal growth of the eye III. Ultrasonic measurement of the posterior segment (axial length of the vitreous) from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmolgica. 49:1971;441-453.
12. Rudnicka A. R., Steele C. F., Crabb D. P., Edgar D. F. Repeatability, reproducibility and intersession variability of the Allergan-Humphrey ultrasonic biometer. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.). 70:(3):1992;327-334.
13. Schelenz J., Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 15:(4):1989;425-428.
14. Shammas H. J. A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. J. Am. Intraocul. Implant Soc. 10:(4):1984;444-447.
15. Sorsby, A., Benjamin, B., Davey, J. B., Sheridan, M. and Tanner, J. (1957). Emmetropia and its Aberrations, London. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, No. 293.
16. Waltman, S. R. and Hart, W. M. (1987). The cornea. ed. M. A. Moses and W. M. Hart. In: Adler's Physiology of the Eye. ed. M. A. Moses and W. M. Hart, The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, USA, pp. 36-59.