General practice deprivation payments: Are rural practices disadvantaged

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 530-531

  O'Reilly, D ^a,b   Steele, K ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b Health and Health Care Research Unit   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; GENERAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN INCOME; POPULATION DENSITY; RURAL AREA; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0031682975     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.8.530     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Carr Hill RA, Sheldon T. Designing a deprivation payment for general practitioners: the UPA (8) wonderland. BMJ 1991;302:393-6.
2. Royal College of General Practitioners. Rural General Practice in the United Kingdom. Occasional Paper 71. London: RCGP, 1995.
3. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. BMJ 1983;312:1705-9.
4. Hastings A. Deprivation payments should be based on enumeration districts. BMJ 1996;312:183-4.
5. Jarman B. Scores should be based on enumeration districts and payments should be phased in gradually. BMJ 1997;314:228-9.