Open access renewable resources: Trade and trade policy in a two-country model

Journal of International Economics

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 181-209

  Brander, James A ^a   Taylor, M Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

International trade policy; Renewable resources

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MODELLING APPROACH; RENEWABLE RESOURCES; THEORY;

EID: 0031682346     PISSN: 00221996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00029-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baldwin, R., 1992. Measurable dynamic gains from trade. Journal of Political Economy 100, 162-174.
2. Barrett, S., 1994. Strategic environmental policy and international trade. Journal of Public Economics 54, 325-338.
3. Bhagwati, J., 1958. Immiserizing growth: a geometrical note. Review of Economic Studies 25, 201-205.
4. Bhagwati, J., Ramaswami, V.K., 1963. Domestic distortions, tariffs, and the theory of optimum subsidy. Journal of Political Economy 71, 44-50.
5. Brander, J.A., Taylor, M.S., 1997a. International trade and open access renewable resources: the small open economy case, Canadian Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
6. Brander, J.A., Taylor, M.S., 1997b. Trade between consumer and conservationist countries, Resource and Energy Economics 30, 526-552.
7. Brander, J.A., Taylor, M.S., 1997c. The simple economics of Easter Island: a Ricardo-Malthus model of renewable resource use, American Economic Review, forthcoming.
8. Brecher, R.A., Choudri, E.U., 1982. Immiserizing investment from abroad: the Singer-Prebisch thesis reconsidered. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97, 181-190.
9. Brown, L.R., 1995. Nature's limits. In: Brown, L.R., et. al. (Eds.), State of the World 1995, Norton, New York, pp. 3-20.
10. Chichilnisky, G., 1991. Global environment and North-South trade. Asian Journal of Economics and Social Studies 10, 185-201.
11. Chichilnisky, G., 1993. North-South trade and the dynamics of renewable resources. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4, 219-248.
12. Chichilnisky, G., 1994. North-South trade and the global environment. American Economic Review 84, 851-874.
13. Clark, C.W., 1990. Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal management of renewable resources, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
14. Cooper, R.N., 1994. Environment and resource policies for the world economy, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
15. Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., 1994. North-South trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 755-787.
16. Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., 1995. Trade and trans-boundary pollution. American Economic Review 85, 716-737.
17. Deardorff, A.V., 1973. The gains from trade in and out of steady-state growth. Oxford Economic Papers 25, 173-191.
18. Deardorff, A.V., 1994. The possibility of factor price equalization, revisited. Journal of International Economics 36, 167-175.
19. Dixit, A., Norman, V., 1980. The theory of international trade: a dual general equilibrium approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Ethier, W.J., 1984. Higher dimensional issues in trade theory. In: Jones R.W., Kenen, P., (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 131-184.
21. Gordon, H.S., 1954. The economic theory of a common property resource: the fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62, 124-142.
22. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
23. Johnson, H.G., 1967. The possibility of income losses from increased efficiency or factor accumulation in the presence of tariffs. Economic Journal 77, 151-154.
24. Kemp, M.C., Long, N.V., 1984. The role of natural resources in trade models. In: Jones R.W., Kenen, P.B. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp. 367- 417.
25. Lopez, R., 1994. The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 163-184.
26. Markusen, J., 1976. Production and trade from international common property resources. Canadian Journal of Economics 9, 309-319.
27. McRae, J., 1978. Optimal and competitive use of replenishable natural resources by open economies. Journal of International Economics 8, 29-54.
28. Munro, G.R., Scott, A.D., 1985. The economics of fisheries management. In: Kneese, A.V., Sweeney, J.L. (Eds.), Handbook of natural resource and energy economics, vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 623-676.
29. Neher, P., 1990. Natural resource economics: conservation and exploitation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Pearce, D.W., Warford, J., 1993. World without end: Economics, environment and sustainable development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Rauscher, M., 1993. On ecological dumping. Oxford Economic Papers 46, 822-840.
32. Reichert, W.M., 1996. Resolving the trade and environmental conflict: the WTO and NGO consultative relations. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 5, 219-246.
33. Scott, A.D., Southey, C., 1969. The problem of achieving efficient regulation of a fishery. In: Scott, A.D. (Ed.), The economics of fishery management: A symposium, Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., pp. 47-59.
34. Schaefer, M.B., 1957. Some considerations of population dynamics and economics in relation to the management of marine fisheries. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 14, 635-647.
35. Srinivasan, T.N. Bhagwati, J.N., 1980. Trade and welfare in steady state. In: Chipman J., Kindleberger, C. (Eds.), Flexible exchange rates and the balance of payments, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 341-353.
36. Taylor, M.S., 1994. 'Once-off and continuing gains from trade. Review of Economic Studies 61, 589-601.
37. World Bank, 1992, A study of international fisheries research, in collaboration with the United Nations Development Programme, the Commission of the European Communities, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of UN, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
38. Yechout, P.J., 1996. In the wake of Tuna II: new possibilities for GATT-compliant environmental standards. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 5, 247-275.