Apparent hybridization between Cnemidophorus gularis and Cnemidophorus septemvittatus from an area of sympatry in southwest Texas

Journal of Herpetology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 418-425

  Forstner, Michael R J ^a,c   Dixon, James R ^b   Forstner, Jenna M ^a   Davis, Scott K ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASE PAIRING; BREEDING; HYBRIDIZATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHENOTYPE;

CNEMIDOPHORUS GULARIS; CNEMIDOPHORUS INORNATUS; CNEMIDOPHORUS LAREDOENSIS; CNEMIDOPHORUS LEMNISCATUS; CNEMIDOPHORUS SEPTEMVITTATUS; CNEMIDOPHORUS SEXLINEATUS; CNEMIDOPHORUS TIGRIS; TEIUS TEYOU;

EID: 0031681364     PISSN: 00221511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1565457     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ARÉVALO, E., S. K. DAVIS, AND J. W. SITES, JR. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in Central Mexico. Syst. Biol. 43:387-418.
2. BICKHAM, J. W., C. O. MCKINNEY, M. F. MATTHEWS. 1976. Karyotypes of the parthenogenic whiptail lizard (Cnemidophorus laredoensis) and its presumed parental species (Sauria: Teiidae). Herpetologica 32:395-399.
3. BURGER, W. L. 1950. New, revived, and reallocated names for North American whiptail lizards, genus Cnemidophorus. Chicago Acad. Sci. Nat. Hist. Misc. 65:1-9.
4. BURT, C. E. 1931. A study of the teiid lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus with special reference to their phylogenetic relationships. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 154:1-286.
5. COLE, C. J. 1990. When is an individual not a species? Herpetologica 46:104-108.
6. COPE, E. D. 1900. Crocodilians, lizards, and snakes of North America. Ann. Rept. U.S. Natl. Mus. 1898: 151-1294.
7. DUELLMAN, W. E., AND R. G. ZWEIFEL. 1962. A synopsis of the lizards of the sexlineatus group (genus Cnemidophorus). Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 123: 155-210.
8. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1990. PHYLIP Manual, Version 3.5. University Herbarium, Univ. California, Berkeley.
9. FORSTNER, M. R. J., S. K. DAVIS, AND E. ARÉVALO. 1995. Support for the hypothesis of Anguimorph ancestry for the Suborder Serpentes from phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molc. Phylogenetics and Evol. 4:93-102.
10. FROST, D. R., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1990. Species in concept and practice: herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46:87-104.
11. _, AND J. W. WRIGHT. 1988. The taxonomy of unisexual species with special reference to parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae). Syst. Zool. 37:200-208.
12. HANKS, B. G. 1983. The nature of electrophoretic variation in the lizards Cnemidophorus gularis, C. inornatus, C. sexlineatus, and C. tigris, with emphasis on populations from the Chihuahuan desert of Texas and Mexico. Unpubl. M.S. Thesis, Sul Ross State University.
13. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Heredity 83:189-195.
14. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, AND M. NEI. 1993. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis. Version 1. Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
15. KUMAZAWA, Y. AND M. NISHIDA. 1995. Variations in mitochondrial tRNA gene organization of reptiles as phylogenetic markers. Molc. Biol. Evol. 12:759-772.
16. LOWE, C. H., J. W. WRIGHT, C. J. COLE, AND R. L. BEZY. 1970. Chromosomes and evolution of the species groups of Cnemidophorus (Reptilia: Teiidae). Syst. Zool. 19:128-141.
17. MORITZ, C., J. W. WRIGHT, V. SINGH, W. M. BROWN. 1992. Mitochondrial DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus. V. The cozumela species group. Evolution 46:184-192.
18. SCHALL, J. J. 1993. Community ecology of Cnemidophorus lizards in south western Texas: a test of the weed hypothesis. In J. Wright and L. Vitt (eds.) Biology of the Whiptail Lizards, pp. 319-345. Oklahoma Mus. Nat. Hist. Norman.
19. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony v. 3.11. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
20. TAMURA, K. AND M. NEI. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molc. Biol. Evol. 10:512-526.
21. WALKER, J. M. 1966. Morphological variation in the teiid lizard Cnemidophorus gularis. Unpubl. Ph.D Diss., Univ. Colorado, Boulder.
22. _. 1981a. Systematics of Cnemidophorus gularis. I. Reallocation of populations currently allocated to Cnemidophorus gularis and Cnemidophorus scalaris in Coahuila, Mexico. Copeia 1981:826-849.
23. _. 1981b. Systematics of Cnemidophorus gularis. II. Specific and subspecific identity of the Zacatecas Whiptail (Cnemidophorus gularis semiannulatus). Copeia 1981:850-868.
24. WRIGHT, J. W. 1993. Evolution of the lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus. In Biology of the Whiptail Lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus), pp. 27-81. Oklahoma Mus. Nat. Hist., Norman.
25. _, AND L. J. VITT. 1993. Biology of the Whiptail Lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus). Oklahoma Mus. Nat. Hist., Norman.
26. ZWEIFEL, R. G. 1959. Variation in and distribution of lizards of western Mexico related to Cnemidophorus sacki. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 17:63-116.
27. _. 1961. Relationship of the two whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus) in Western Mexico. Copeia 1961:98-103.