Planar homologies as a basis for grouping and recognition

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 21-26

  Van Gool, Luc ^a   Proesmans, Marc ^a   Zisserman, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Extruded shapes; Grouping; Invariants; Planar homologies; Projective geometry; Shadows

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

PLANAR HOMOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

EID: 0031680972     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00046-2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. D. Forsyth and C. Rothwell, Representations of 3D objects that incorporate surface markings, in: Mundy, Zisserman, & Forsyth (Eds), Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, LNCS 825, Springer-Verlag, 1994, pp. 341-357.
2. R. Glachet, J. Lapreste, M. Dhome, Locating and modelling a flat symmetric object from a single projective image, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 57 (2) (1993) 219-226.
3. T. Kanada, Recovery of the 3-Dimensional shape of an object from a single view, Artificial Intelligence 17 (1981) 75-116.
4. T. Kanade and J. Kender, Mapping image properties into shape constraints: skewed symmetry, affine-transformable patterns, and the shape-from-texture paradigm, CMU-CS-90-133, July 1980.
5. D. Lowe, Perceptual organization and visual recognition, Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, Report No. STAN-CS-84-1020, Sept. 1984.
6. D. Mukherjee, A. Zisserman, M. Brady, Shape from symmetry detecting and exploiting symmetry in affine images, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A 351 (1995) 77-106.
7. J. Mundy and A. Zisserman, Repeated structures: image correspondence constraints and 3D structure recovery: in Mundy, Zisserman & Forsyth (Eds), Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, Springer, 1994, pp. 89-106.
8. J. Ponce, On characterising ribbons and finding skewed symmetries, Proc. Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1989, 49-54.
9. J. Shufelt, D. McKeown, Fusion of monocular cues to detect manmade structures in aerial imagery, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing: Image Understanding 57 (3) (1993) 307-330.
10. C. Springer, Geometry and analysis of projective spaces, Freeman, 1964.
11. F. Ulupinar, R. Nevatia, Constraints, for interpretation of line drawings under perspective projection, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, Image Understanding 53 (1) (1991) 88-96.
12. L. Van Gool, T. Moons, M. Proesmans and M. Van Diest, Affine reconstruction from perspective image pairs obtained by a translating camera, Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, Jerusalem, 1994, A/290-A/294.
13. L. Van Gool, T. Moons, D. Ungureanu, A. Oosterlinck, The characterisation and detection of skewed symmetry, , Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing: Image Understanding 61 (1) (1995) 138-150.
14. L. Van Gool, M. Proesmans and T. Moons, Groups for grouping, SPIE Int. Symp. on Optical Science, Appl. of Digital Image Processing XVIII, Vol. 2564, 1995, pp. 402-413.
15. L. Van Gool, T. Moons and M. Proesmans, Mirror and point symmetry under perspective skewing, IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, June 1996, pp. 285-292.