Comparison of three computerized videokeratoscopy systems with keratometry

Cornea

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 522-528

  Moura, Rita Cristina M R ^a,b   Bowyer, Barry L ^b   Stevens, Scott X ^b,c   Rowsey, J James ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Corneal topography; EyeSys; Manual keratometer; PAR C Scan; Videokeratoscopy systems

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KERATOMETRY; KERATOSCOPY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031680250     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199809000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Binder PS. Videokeratography. CLAO J 1995;21:133-44.
2. Maquire L, Lowry J. Identifying progression of subclinical keratoconus by serial topography analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112: 41-5.
3. Rabinowitz Y, Nesburn A, McDonnel P. Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1993;100: 181-6.
4. Wilson S, Lin D, Klyce S, et al. Topographic changes in contact lens-induced corneal warpage. Ophthalmology 1990;97:734-5.
5. Lin DTC, Wilson SE, Reidy JJ. Topographic changes that occur with 10-0 running suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg 1990;6:21-5.
6. McDonnell PJ, Garbus JJ, Salz JJ. Excimer laser myopic photorefractive keratectomy after undercorrected radial keratotomy. Refract Corneal Surg 1991;7:146-7.
7. Bogan S, Maloney R, Drews C, Waring G III. Computer-assisted videokeratography of corneal topography after radial keratotomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:834-41.
8. Pallikaris I, Papatzanaki M, Siganos D, Tsilimbaris M. A corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis: human studies. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1699-702.
9. Maquire LJ. Corneal topography of patients with excellent Snellen visual acuity after epikeratophakia for aphakia. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:162-7.
10. Dingeldein S, Klyce S. The topography of normal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:512-5.
11. Koch D, Foulks G, Moran C, Wakil J. The EyeSys corneal analysis system accuracy and reproducibility of the first-generation prototype. Refract Corneal Surg 1989;5:424-9.
12. Hannush S, Crawford S, Waring GO III, et al. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1235-9.
13. Hannush S, Waring GO III. Computer assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility with three instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;32(suppl):389.
14. Hannush S, Crawford S, Waring GO III, et al. Reproducibility of normal corneal power measurements with a keratometer photokeratoscope and video imaging system. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:539-44.
15. Tsilimbaris M, Vlachonikolis I, Siganos D, et al. Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal ophthalmometer and corneal analysis system (EyeSys). Refract Corneal Surg 1991;7: 368-73.
16. Koch D, Wakil J, Samuelson S, Haft E. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys corneal analysis system model I. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18: 342-7.
17. Legeais JM, Ren Q, Simon G, Parel JM. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of topographic modeling system. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9:347-57.
18. Maquire L, Wilson S, Camp J, Verity S. Evaluating the reproducibility of topography systems on spherical surfaces. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:259-62.
19. Roberts C. Characterization of the inherent error in a spherically-biased corneal topography system in mapping a radially aspheric surface. J Refract Corneal Surg 1994;10:103-16.
20. Belin MW, Litoff D, Strods SJ, Winn SS, Smith RS. The PAR Technology Corneal Topography System. Refract Corneal Surg 1992;8:88-96.
21. Belin MW, Ratliff CD. Evaluating data acquisition and smoothing functions of currently available videokeratoscopes. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:421-6.
22. Naufal SC, Hess JS, Friedlander MH, Granet NS. Raster stereography-based classification of normal corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:222-30.
23. Tate GJ, Safir A, Mills C, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of keratometer readings. CLAO J 1987;13:50-8.
24. Brungardt T. Repeatability of keratometric readings. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1969;46:686-90.
25. Brungardt T. Repeatability of keratometric readings: addendum. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1973;50:736-40.
26. Dabezies OJ, Holladay J. Measurement of corneal curvature: keratometer (ophthalmometer). In: Dabezies OJ, Farris L, Lemp M, eds. Contact lenses: the CLAO guide to basic science and clinical practice. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton, 1984:17.1-.29.
27. Roberts C. Analysis of the inherent error of the TMS-1 topographic modeling system in mapping a radially aspheric surface. Cornea 1995;14:258-65.
28. Roberts C. The accuracy of "power" maps to display curvature data in corneal topography systems. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:3525-32.
29. McCarey BE, Zurasky CA, O'Shea DS. Practical aspects of a corneal topography system: CLAO J 1992;18:248-54.
30. Rowsey JJ, Isaac M. Corneoscopy in keratorefractive surgery. Cornea 1983;2:133-41.
31. Hubbe RE, Foulks GN. The effect of poor fixation on computer-assisted topographic corneal analysis. Ophthalmology 1994;101: 1745-8.