Effects of sensor selection on exercise stroke volume in pacemaker dependent patients

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1700-1708

  Haennel, Robert G ^a   Logan, Trina ^a   Dunne, Catherine ^a   Burgess, John ^b   Busse, Edward ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b Division of Cardiovascular Surgery   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dual sensor; Exercise; QT sensor; Stroke volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; SENSOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARRHYTHMIA; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; SOFTWARE; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 0031667337     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00267.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, et al. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 1987; 75:184-191.
2. Iwase M, Hatano K, Saito F, et al. Evaluation be exercise Doppler echocardiography of maintenance of cardiac: output during ventricular pacing with and without chronotropic response. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:934-938.
3. Gammage M, Schoflied S, Rankin I, et al. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed rate demand pacing in elderly patients. PACE 1991; 14:174-180.
4. Humen DP, Kostuk WJ, Klein GJ. Activity-sensing, rate responsive pacing: Improvement in myocardial performance with exercise. PACE 1985; 8:52-59.
5. Lipkin DP, Buller N, Frenneaux M, et al. Randomized crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed-rate ventricular pacing. Br Heart J 1987; 58:613-616.
6. Koliopoulus N. Comparative study in exercise tolerance between VVI and activity sensing rate responsive pacing. Eur Heart J 1987; 8(Suppl D): 159-161.
7. Lau C-F, Mehta D, Toff WD, et al. Limitations of rate response of an activity sensing rate responsive pacemaker to different forms of activity. PACE 1988; 11:141.
8. Mehta D, Lau C-P, Ward DE, et al. Comparative evaluation of chronotropic responses of QT sensing and activity sensing rate responsive pacemakers. PACE 1988; 11:1405-1412.
9. Lau C-P, Butrous GS, Ward DE, et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate adaptive ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:833-838.
10. Bellamy CM, Roberts DH, Hughes S, et al. Comparative evaluation of rate modulation in new generation evoked QT and activity sensing pacemakers. PACE 1992; 15:993-999.
11. Sulke AN, Pipilis A, Henderson RA, et al. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemakers during everyday activities. Br Heart J 1990; 64:25-31.
12. Conelly DT, The Topaz™ Study Group. Initial experience with a new single chamber dual sensor rate responsive pacemaker. PACE 1993; 16:1833-1841.
13. Alt E, Theres H, Heinz M, et al. A new rate modulated pacemaker system optimized by combination of two sensors. PACE 1988; 11:1119-1129.
14. Astrand PO, Cuddy TE, Saltin B, et al. Cardiac output during maximal and submaximal work. J Appl Physiol 1964; 19:268-274.
15. Provenier F, Van Acker R, Backers J, et al. Clinical observations with a dual sensor rate adaptive single chamber pacemaker. PACE 1992; 15:1821-1825.
16. Clinical Evaluation Department, Vitatron Medical B.V. Clinical evaluation report: Topaz™ dual sensor pacemaker. Vitatext 1992; 2:1-7.
17. Wilkoff BL, Corey J, Blackburn G. A mathematical model of the cardiac chronotropic response to exercise. J Electrophysiol 1989; 3:176-180.
18. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (5th ed). Philadelphia, Williams and Wilkins, 1995, p. 97.
19. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60:2020-2027.
20. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 1986; 14:904-909.
21. Sramek BB. Hemodynamic and pump performance monitoring by electrical bioimpedance. New Concepts Resp Care. 1989; 2:274-290.
22. Thomas SHL. Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: Accuracy and variability at rest and during exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 34:467-476.
23. Hetherington M, Haennel RG, Teo KK, et al. Importance of considering ventricular function when prescribing exercise after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58:891-895.
24. Teo KK, Hetherington MD, Haennel RG, et al. Cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography during maximal exercise. Cardiovasc Res 1985; 19:737-743.
25. Lewis RP, Leighton RF, Forester WF, et al. Systolic time intervals. In AM Weissler (ed.): Noninvasive Cardiology. New York, Stratton and Grune, 1974, pp. 301-368.
26. Hill DW, Merrifield AJ. Left ventricular ejection and the heather index measured by non-invasive methods during postural changes in man. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1976; 20:313-320.
27. Frey MAB, Doerr BM. Correlations between ejection times measured from the carotid pulse contour and the impedance cardiogram. Aviat Space Environ Med 1983; 54:894-897.
28. Sheps, DS, Petrovick ML, Kizakevich D, et al. Continuous noninvasive monitoring of ventricular function with impedance cardiography. Am Heart J 1982; 103:519-524.
29. Snedacor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods (8th ed.) Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1989, pp. 390-393.
30. Ausubel K, Steingart RM, Shimshi M, et al. Maintenance of exercise stroke volume during ventricular versus atrial synchronous pacing: Role of contractility. Circulation 1985; 72(5):1037-1043.
31. Ovsyshcher I, Gross JN, Blumberg S, et al. Precision of impedance cardiography measurements of cardiac output in pacemaker patients. PACE 1992:15: 1923-1926.