Role of the primary auditory cortex in auditory selective attention studied by whole-head neuromagnetometer

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 99-109

  Fujiwara, Naohito ^a   Nagamine, Takashi ^a   Imai, Makoto ^a   Tanaka, Tomohiro ^a   Shibasaki, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory selective attention; N100m; Primary auditory cortex; Processing negativity; Whole head MEG

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HEARING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0031666922     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00014-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. A.I. Ahonen, M.S. Hämäläinen, M.J. Kajola, J.E.T. Knuutila, P.P. Laine, O.V. Lounasmaa, L.T. Parkkonen, J.T. Simola, C.D. Tesche, 122-channel SQUID instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain, Phys. Scr. T49 (1993) 198-205.
2. D.L. Arthur, S.A. Hillyard, E.R. Flynn, A. Schmidt, Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention, in: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink, M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism, Plenum, New York, 1989, pp. 113-116.
3. D.L. Arthur, P.S. Lewis, P.A. Medwick, E.R. Flynn, A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention, Electroenchephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78 (1991) 348-360.
4. D.E. Broadbent, Stimulus set and response set: two kinds of selective attention, in: D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary Theory and Analysis, Applenton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1970, pp. 51-60.
5. D. Cohen, B.N. Cuffin, Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram, Electroenchephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56 (1983) 38-51.
6. S. Curtis, L. Kaufman, S.J. Wiiliamson, Divided attention revisited: selection based on location or pitch, in: K. Atsumi, M. Kotani, S. Ueno, T. Katila, S.J. Williamson (Eds.), Biomagnetism: 6th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo, 1987, pp. 138-141.
7. M.H. Giard, F. Perrin, J. Pernier, Scalp topographies dissociate attentional ERP components during auditory information processing, Acta Otolaryngol. 491 (1991) 168-175, Suppl.
8. C.L. Grady, J.W. Van Meter, J.M. Maisog, P. Pietrini, J. Krasuski, J.P. Rauschecker, Attention-related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex, NeuroReport 8 (1997) 2511-2516.
9. M. Hämäläinen, Anatomical correlates for magnetoencephalography: integration with magnetic resonance images, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 12 (1991) 29-32.
10. M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, O.V. Lounasmaa, Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 (1993) 413-497.
11. J.C. Hansen, S.A. Hillyard, Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 49 (1980) 277-290.
12. R. Hari, M.S. Hämäläinen, E. Kaukoranta, J. Mäkelä, S.L. Joutsiniemi, J. Tiihonen, Selective listening modifies activity of the human auditory cortex, Exp. Brain Res. 74 (1989) 463-470.
13. S.A. Hillyard, R.F. Hink, V.L. Schwent, T.W. Picton, Electrical signs of selective attention in the brain, Science 182 (1973) 177-180.
14. S.A. Hillyard, G.R. Mangun, M.G. Woldorff, S.J. Luck, Neural systems mediating selective attention, in: M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1995, pp. 665-681.
15. A. Kanno, N. Nakasato, S. Fujita, K. Seki, T. Kawamura, S. Ohtomo, S. Fujiwara, T. Yoshimoto, Right hemispheric dominance in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 47 (1996) 129-132, Suppl.
16. L. Karlin, Cognition, preparation, and sensory-evoked potentials, Psychol. Bull. 73 (1970) 122-136.
17. S. Levänen, A. Ahonen, R. Hari, L. McEvoy, M. Sams, Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently, Cereb. Cortex 6 (1996) 288-296.
18. F.H. Lopes da Silva, H.J. Wieringa, M.J. Peters, Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations, Brain Topogr. 4 (1991) 133-142.
19. R. Näätänen, Selective attention and evoked potentials, Ann. Acad. Scientiarum Fennicae B 151 (1967) 1-226.
20. R. Näätänen, Selective attention and evoked potentials in humans: a critical review, Biol. Psychol. 2 (1975) 237-307.
21. R. Näätänen, The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive functions, Behav. Brain Sci. 13 (1990) 201-288.
22. R. Näätänen, A.W.K. Gaillard, S. Mantysälo, Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted, Acta Psychol. 42 (1978) 313-329.
23. R. Näätänen, A.W.K. Gaillard, C.A. Varey, Attention affects on auditory EPs as a function of interstimulus interval, Biol. Psychol. 13 (1981) 175-187.
24. P. Paavilainen, K. Alho, K. Reinikainen, M. Sams, R. Näätänen, Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78 (1991) 466-479.
25. J. Rif, R. Hari, M.S. Hämäläinen, M. Sams, Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 79 (1991) 464-472.
26. H. Stefan, S. Schneider, K. Abraham-Fuchs, J. Bauer, H. Feistel, G. Pawlik, U. Neubauer, G. Rohrlein, W.J. Huk, Magnetic source localization in focal epilepsy, Brain 113 (1990) 1347-1359.
27. K. Suzuki, J. Okuda, N. Nakasato, A. Kanno, K. Hatanaka, A. Yamadori, T. Fujii, Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients with right hemisphere language dominance, NeuroReport 8 (1997) 3363-3366.
28. C.D. Tesche, M.A. Uusitalo, R.J. Ilmoniemi, M. Huotilainen, M. Kajola, O. Salonen, Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95 (1995) 189-200.
29. N. Tzourio, F.E. Massioui, F. Crivello, M. Joliot, B. Renault, B. Mazoyer, Functional anatomy of human auditory attention studied with PET, NeuroImage 5 (1997) 63-77.
30. M.A. Uusitalo, R.J. Ilmoniemi, The signal space projection (SSP) method for separating MEG and EEG into components, Report TKK-FA751, Helsinki University of Technology, 1996.
31. D.L. Woods, C.C. Clayworth, Scalp topographies dissociate N1 and Nd components during auditory selective attention, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 40 (1987) 155-160, Suppl.
32. D.L. Woods, R.T. Knight, Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractability after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions, Neurology 36 (1986) 212-216.