Applying current research to influence clinical practice

Journal of Intravenous Nursing

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 271-274

  Kupensky, Diane Taczak ^a  

^a ST ELIZABETH HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN; SILICON;

CATHETER INFECTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INDWELLING CATHETER; NURSING; OCCLUSION; PHLEBITIS; REVIEW; VASCULAR ACCESS;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; PATIENT SELECTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031665764     PISSN: 08965846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Bostrum J, Wise L. Closing the gap between research and practice. JONA 1994;24(5):22-7.
2. Coyle LA, Sokop AG. Innovation adoption behavior among nurses. Nurs Res 1990;39(3):176-80.
3. Brett JL. Use of nursing practice research findings. Nurs Res 1987;36(6):344-9.
4. Champion VL, Leach AS. The relationship of support, availability and attitude to research utilization. J Nurs Adm 1986;16(3):19-37.
5. Thomas E. Attitudes towards nursing research among trained nurses. Nurs Educ Today 1985;4(4):18-21.
6. Lambert CE, Lambert VA. Clinical nursing research: its meaning to the practicing nurse. App Nurs Res 1988;1(2):54-7.
7. Lesser E, Chhabra R, Brion LP, Suresh BR. Use of midline catheters in low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 1996;16(3):205-7.
8. Hadaway LC. Comparison of vascular access devices. Semin Oncol Nurs 1995;11(3):154-66.
9. Orr ME, Ryder MA. Vascular access devices: perspectives on designs, complications, and management. Nutr Clin Prac 1993;8(4):145-52.
10. Position Paper. Midline and midclavicular catheters. J Intraven Nurs 1997;20(4):175-8.
11. Hadaway LC. A midline alternative to central and peripheral venous access. Caring 1990;5:45-50.
12. Mermel LA, Parenteau MS, Tow SM. The risk of midline catheterization in hospitalized patients: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1995;123(11):841-4.
13. Sitges-Serra A, Puig P, Linares J, Perez JL, Farrero N, Garau JI. Hub colonization as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter-related sepsis due to coagulase negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition. JPEN 1984;8:668-72.
14. Pennington CR, Pithie AD. Ethanol lock in the management of catheter occlusion. JPEN 1987;11:507-8.
15. Shulman RJ, Reed T, Pitre D, et al. Use of hydrochloric acid to clear obstructed central venous catheters. JPEN 1988;12:509-10.
16. Lawson M, Bottino JC, Hurtubise MR, et al. The use of urokinase to restore patency of occluded central venous catheters. Am J IV Ther Clin Nutr 1982;9:29-32.
17. Cervera M, Dolz M, Herraez JV, Belda R. Evaluation of elastic behavior of central venous PVE, polyurethane and silicone catheters. Phys Med Biol 1989;34:177-83.
18. Borow M, Crowley JG. Prevention of thrombosis of central venous catheters. J Cardiovasc Surg 1986;27:571-4.
19. Brown JM. Peripherally inserted central catheters: Use in home care. J Intraven Nurs 1989;12(3):144-50.
20. Vanek V, Kupensky D, Thomson D. Hypersensitivity-like reactions related to insertion of aquavene-based midline and PICC catheters. J Intraven Nurs 1997;20(1):23-7.
21. Blum DY. Untoward events associated with use of midline IV devices. J Intraven Nurs 1995;18(3):116-9.
22. Leung PSC, Halpern GM, Gershwin ME. Evaluation of possible histamine release from human peripheral blood cells using an enzyme immunoassay (HRT) with components of intravenous catheters. Allerg Immunol 1993;25:346-53.
23. Silverstein B, Witkin KM, Frankos VH, Terr AI. Assessing the role of the biomaterial Aquavene in patient reactions to Landmark midline catheters. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1997;25(1):60-7.
24. Mermel LA, Tow SM, Mahoney M. Adverse reactions associated with Midline catheters - United States, 1992-1995. JAMA 1996; 275:749-50.
25. Mateo MA, Kirchhoff KT. Conducting and using nursing research in the clinical setting. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1991:93-107.