Stereotactic excisional breast biopsy performed by interventional radiologists using the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation system

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 71, Issue 850, 1998, Pages 1003-1011

  Damascelli, B ^a   Frigerio, L F ^a   Lanocita, R ^a   Patelli, G ^a   Viganotti, G ^a   Di Tolla, G ^a   Magnoni, S ^a   Ticha, V ^a   Galante, E ^a   Attili, A ^a   Saccozzi, R ^a   Tomasich, G ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CALCIFICATION; CANNULA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXCISION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT SELECTION; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; SKILL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

AGED; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CATHETERIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0031665737     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.850.10211058     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bassett LW, Liu TH, Giuliano AE, Gold RH. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs impalpable, mammographically detected lesions. AJR 1991;157:21-4.
2. Bauer TL, Pandelidis SM, Rhoads JE, Owens RS. Mammographically detected carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:482-6.
3. Thompson WR, Bowen JR, Dorman BA, Pricolo VE, Shahinian TK, Soderberg CH Jr. Mammographic localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a 5-year study. Arch Surg 1991;126:730-4.
4. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Day NE. Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening. Lancet 1992;15:339-412.
5. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Hsiu-Hsi C. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish two-county trial. Cancer 1995;75:2507-17.
6. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1992;158:521-8.
7. Potterton AJ, Peakman DJ, Young IR. Ultrasound demonstration of small breast cancers detected by mammographic screening. Clin Radiol 1994;49:808.
8. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P. Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. In: Davis PL, editor. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. Breast imaging. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:527-36.
9. Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, et al. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. JCAT 1996;20:9-14.
10. Evans P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Current Opin Radiol 1992;4:130-8.
11. Bassett LW, Jackson VP, Jahan R, Fu YS, Gold RH, editors. Diagnosis of diseases of the breast. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1997;251-61.
12. Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Non palpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988;167:353-8.
13. Kaye MD, Vicinanza-Adami CA, Sullivan ML. Mammographic findings after stereotaxic core biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. Radiology 1994;192:149-51.
14. Liberman L, Dershaw D, Rosen P, Abramson A, Deutch B, Hann L. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994;192:793-5.
15. Liberman L, Hann L, Dershaw D, Morris E, Abramson A, Rosen P. Mammographic findings after stereotactic 14-gauge vacuum biopsy. Radiology 1997;203:343-7.
16. Brenner RJ. Follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for probably benign mammographically detected abnormalities. Current Opin Radiol 1991;3:588-92.
17. Datoc PD, Hayes CW, Conway WF, Bosch HA, Neal MP. Mammographic follow-up of nonpalpable low-suspicion breast abnormalities: one versus two views. Radiology 1991;180:387-91.