Yellow bush lupine invasion in northern California coastal dunes I. Ecological impacts and manual restoration techniques

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 59-68

  Pickart, Andrea J ^a   Miller, Linda M ^b   Duebendorfer, Thomas E ^c  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

^b Center for Natural Lands Management   (United States)

^c HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROME; DUNE; EUROPEAN HAIRGRASS; INTRODUCED PLANT; RESTORATION; VELVET GRASS; YELLOW BUSH LUPINE;

USA, CALIFORNIA, HUMBOLDT BAY;

EID: 0031664579     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.1998.00618.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alpert, P., and H. A. Mooney. 1996. Resource heterogeneity by shrubs and topography on coastal sand dunes. Vegetatio 122:83-93.
2. Barbour, M. G., T. M. DeJong, and B. M. Pavlik. 1985. Marine beach and dune plant communities. Pages 296-322 in B. F. Chabot and H. A. Mooney, editors. Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Burke, M. J., and J. P. Grime. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776-790.
4. Choi, Y. D., and N. D. Pavlovic. 1994. Comparison of fire, herbicide, and sod removal to control exotic vegetation. Natural Areas Journal 14:217-218.
5. Davidson, E. D., and M. G. Barbour. 1997. Germination, establishment, and demography of coastal bush lupine (Lupinus arboreus) at Bodega Head, California. Ecology 58:592-600.
6. Davy, J. B. 1902. Stock ranges of northwestern California: notes on the grasses and forage plants and range conditions. Bulletin no. 12 of the Bureau of Plant Industry, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
7. Duebendorfer, T. E. 1990. An integrated approach to enhancing rare plant populations through habitat restoration. II. Habitat characterization through classification of dune vegetation. Pages 478-487 in T. M. Bonnicksen and H. G. Hughes, editors. Restoration '89: the new management challenge. Society of Ecological Restoration, Madison, Wisconsin.
8. Hausenbuiller, R. L. 1975. Soil science, principles and practices. William C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa.
9. Hitchcock, C. L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: an illustrated manual. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
10. Hobbs, R. J., and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324-337.
11. Hobbs, R. J., and S. E. Humphries. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 9:761-770.
12. Holton, B., M. G. Barbour, and S. N. Martens. 1991. Some aspects of the nitrogen cycle in a California strand ecosystem. Madroño 38:170-184.
13. Horn, E. L. 1993. Coastal wildflowers of the Pacific Northwest. Mountain Press Publishing Company, Missoula, Montana.
14. LaBanca, T. 1993. Vegetation changes at Clam Beach coastal dunes, Humboldt County, California. M.A. thesis. Department of Biology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California.
15. Maron, J. L., and P. G. Connors. 1996. A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia 105:302-312.
16. Miller, L. M. 1988. How yellow bush lupine came to Humboldt Bay. Fremontia 16:6-7.
17. Murdoch, A. J., and R. H. Ellis. 1992. Longevity, viability and dormancy. Pages 193-230 in M. Fenner, editor. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
18. Parker, J. 1974. Coastal dune systems between Mad River and Little River, Humboldt County, California. M.A. thesis. Department of Biology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California.
19. Pickart, A. J., and J. O. Sawyer. 1998. Ecology and restoration of northern California coastal dunes. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, California.
20. Pickart, A. J., T. E. Duebendorfer, and L. M. Miller. 1990. An integrated approach to enhancing rare plant populations through habitat restoration. III. Restoration of altered coastal dunes. Pages 488-500 in H. G. Hughes and T. M. Bonnicksen, editors. Restoration '89: the new management challenge. Society for Ecological Restoration, Madison, Wisconsin.
21. Ramakrishnan, P. S., and P. M. Vitousek. 1989. Ecosystem-level processes and the consequences of biological invasions. Pages 281-300 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. Di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, New York.
22. Sawyer, J. O., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California.
23. Sholars, T. 1993. Lupines. Pages 622-636 in J. C. Hickman, editor. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
24. Vitousek, P. M. 1986. Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? Pages 163-176 in H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake, editors. Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York.
25. Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7-13.
26. Vitousek, P. M., L. R. Walker, L. D. Whiteaker, D. Mueller-Dombois, and P. A. Matson. 1987. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238: 802-804.
27. Zink, T. A., M. F. Allen, B. Heindl-Tenhunen, and E. B. Allen. 1996. The effect of a disturbance corridor on an ecological reserve. Restoration Ecology 3:304-310.