Microcirculatory hemodynamics during the acute phase of free vascularized muscle allograft rejection

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 275-282

  Siemionow, Maria ^a   Kimori, Kenji ^b   Lister, Graham ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CELL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAFT REJECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LYMPHOCYTIC INFILTRATION; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; MUSCLE GRAFT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

EID: 0031664566     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199809000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kanagawa K, Ishikura H, Takahashi C, et al. Identification of ICAM-1 positive cells in the nongrafted and transplanted rat kidney - an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Transplantation 1991;52:1057-1062
2. Fuggle SV, Sanderson JB, Gray DWR, et al. Variation in expression of endothelial adhesion molecules in pretransplant and transplanted kidneys - correlation with intragraft events. Transplantation 1993;55:117-123
3. Morgan CJ, Pelletier RP, Hernandez, et al. Alloantigen-dependent endothelial phenotype and lymphokine mRNA expression in rejecting murine cardiac allografts. Transplantation 1993;55:919-924
4. Youker KA, Hawkins HK, Kukielka GL, et al. Molecular evidence for induction of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in the viable border zone associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury of the dog heart. Circulation 1994;89: 2736-2746
5. Ma X-L, Lefer DJ, Lefer AM, et al. Coronary endothelial and cardiac protective effects of a monoclonal antibody to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation 1992;86:937-946
6. Cosimi AB, Conti D, Delmonico FL, et al. In vivo effects of monoclonal antibody to ICAM-1 (CD 54) in nonhuman primates with renal allografts. J Immunol 1990;144:4606-4612
7. Kerman RH. Immune monitoring considerations in transplantation. In: Flye MW, ed. Principles of organ transplantation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989:23-41
8. Dallman MJ. Cytokines as mediators of organ graft rejection and tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol 1993;5:788-793
9. Haug CE, Colvin RB, Delmonico FL, et al. A phase 1 trial of immunosuppression with anti-ICAM-1 (CD54) mAb in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 1993;55:766-773
10. National Institute of Health. The guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, 1996
11. Duling BR. The preparation and use of the hamster cheek pouch for studies of the microcirculation. Microvasc Res 1973;5:423-427
12. Zarem HA, Soderberg R. Tissue reaction to ischemia in the rabbit ear chamber. Effects of prednisolone on inflammation and microvascular flow. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;70: 667-672
13. Eriksson E, Replogle RL, Glagov S. Reperfusion of skeletal muscle after warm ischemia. Ann Plast Surg 1987;18:224-227
14. Grant RT. Direct observations of skeletal muscle blood vessels (rat cremaster). J Physiol 1964;172:123-137
15. Baez S. An open cremaster muscle preparation for the study of blood vessels by in vivo microscopy. Microvasc Res 1973;5:384-387
16. Siemionow M, Andreasen T, Lister GD. Microcirculatory response to transplantation-related trauma. A model for composite tissue transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg 1995;11: 7-13
17. Gore RW, Baldwin AL. Intestinal and mesenteric preparation for microvascular studies. In: Baker CH, Nastuk WL, eds. Microvasculatory technology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986:36-47
18. Anderson ND, Wyllie RG, Shaker IJ. Pathogenesis of vascular injury in rejecting rat renal allograft. Johns Hopkins Med J 1977;141:135-147
19. Thiru S. Pathology of rejection. In: Caline RY, ed. Kidney: transplantation immunology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1984:9-52
20. Gornet MF, Randolph MA, Schofield BH, et al. Immunologic and ultrastructural changes during early rejection of vascularized bone allografts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;88: 860-868
21. Forbes RDC, Guttmann RD, Gomersall M, Hibberd J. A controlled serial ultrastructural tracer study of first-set cardiac allograft rejection in the rat. Evidence that the microvascular endothelium is the primary target of graft destruction. Am J Pathol 1983;111:184-187
22. Siemionow M, Wang WZ, Anderson G, Firrell J. Leukocyte-endothelial interaction and capillary perfusion in ischemia/reperfusion of the rat cremaster muscle. Microcirc Endothelium Lymphatics 1991;7(436):183-197
23. Billingham ME. Diagnosis of cardiac rejection by endomyocardial biopsy. Heart Transplant 1980;1:25-30
24. Ertel W, Reichenspurner H, Lersh C, et al. Cyto-immunological monitoring in acute rejection and viral, bacterial or fungal infection following transplantation. J Heart Transplant 1985;4:390-394
25. Dawkins KD, Oldershaw PJ, Billingham ME, et al. Change in diastolic function as a non-invasive marker of cardiac allograft rejection. Heart Transplant 1984;3:286-294
26. Haung CE, Shapiro JI, Chan L, Weil III R. P-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic evaluation of heterotopic cardiac allograft rejection in the rat. Transplantation 1987;44:175-178
27. Rosenbloom M, Eisen HJ, Laschinger J, et al. Non-invasive assessment of treatment of cardiac allograft rejection with indium-111-labeled lymphocytes. Transplantation 1988; 46:341-346
28. Isobe M, Harber E, Khaw BA. Early detection of rejection and assessment of cyclosporin therapy by 111 In antimycin imaging in mouse heart allograft. Circulation 1991;84: 1246-1255
29. Eagle KA, Harber E, Desanctis RW, Austen WG, eds. The practice of cardiology. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1998:1719-1758
30. Garden DL, Smith JK, Korthuis RJ. Neutxophil-mediated microvascular dysfunction in postischemic canine skeletal muscle: role of granulocyte adherence. Circ Res 1990; 66:1436-1444