Design review in small communities

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 539-557

  Onaran, K S ^a   Sancar, F H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; LAND USE PLANNING; PLANNING PRACTICE; PUBLIC ATTITUDES; SOCIAL DISCOURSE;

USA; WISCONSIN;

EID: 0031664448     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/b250539     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahern J, 1991, "Planning for an extensive open space system: linking landscape structure and function" Landscape and Urban Planning 21 131-145
2. AIA, 1974 Design Review Boards: A Handbook for Communities (The American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC)
3. Alexander C, Neis H, Anninou A, King I, 1987 A New Theory of Urban Design (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
4. Appleyard D, 1979, "The environment as a social symbol: within a theory of environmental action and perception" The APA Journal 1979 143-153
5. Bierne P, 1982, "Ideology and rationality in Max Weber's sociology of law", in Marxism and Law Eds P Bierne, R Quinney (John Wiley, New York) pp 54-57
6. Brooks R O, Lavigne P, 1985, "Aesthetic theory and landscape protection: the many meanings of beauty and their implications for the design, control and protection of Vermont's landscape" UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 2 129-172
7. Calthorpe P, 1993 The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream (Princeton Architectural Press, New York)
8. Costonis J, 1989 Icons and Aliens: Law, Aesthetics, and Environmental change (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL)
9. Davidoff P, 1965, "Advocacy and pluralism in planning" Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 331-338
10. Faludi A, 1985, "The return of rationality", in Rationality in Planning: Critical Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning Eds M Breheny, A Hooper (Pion, London) pp 27-47
11. Forester J, 1988a, "Beyond the equity - efficiency conflict: the practical analysis of ambiguity in planning practice" The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 5 91-109
12. Forester J, 1988b, "Critical theory and planning practice", in Critical theory and public life Ed. J Forester (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 67-98
13. Forester J, 1989 Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
14. Forester J, 1993 Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
15. Friedman J, 1987 Planning in the Public Domain: From Theory to Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
16. Giddens A, 1971 Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
17. Goldstein H A, 1984, "Planning as argumentation" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 11 297-312
18. Greider T, Garkovich L, 1994, "Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment" Rural Sociology 59(1) 1-24
19. Habermas J, 1970 Toward a rational society (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
20. Hasson S, Goldberg M A, 1987, "Rationalism, bureaucracy, and ethics" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 14 15-27
21. Jacobs A, Appleyard D, 1987, "Toward an urban design manifesto" The APA Journal (winter), 112-120
22. Jacobs J, 1961 The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Vintage Books, New York)
23. Koppes C R, 1987, "Efficiency/equity/esthetics: towards a reinterpretation of American Conservation" Environmental Review (summer), 127-146
24. Krumholz N, 1982, "A retrospective view of equity planning: Cleveland, 1969-1979" Journal of the American Institute of Planners 48 163-174
25. Lai R T, 1988 Law in Urban Design and Planning: The Invisible Web (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York)
26. Lightner C B, 1992, "Setting the stage for debate", in International Symposium on Design Review Eds B Lightner, W Preiser, School of Architecture and Interior Design, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, pp 1-10
27. Lindblom C E, 1959, "The science of 'muddling through'" Public Administration Review 19 79-88
28. Lindblom C E, 1965 The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment (Free Press, New York)
29. Macauley S, 1966 The Balance and Power: The Automobile Manufacturers and their Dealers (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
30. Morisawa M, 1971, "Evaluating riverscapes", in Environmental Geomorphology Ed. D Coates (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 112-125
31. Nassauer J I, 1992, "The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy" Landscape Ecology 6 239-250
32. Norberg-Schulz C, 1985 The Concept of Dwelling: Toward a Figurative Architecture (Rizzoli, New York)
33. Oldenburg R, 1988 The Great Good Place (Paragon, New York)
34. Polakowski K J, 1975, "Landscape assessment of the Upper Great Lakes Basin resources: A macrogeomorphic and micro-composition analysis", in Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions, and Resources Eds E H Zube, R O Rush, J Fabos (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsbourg, PA) pp 203-219
35. Pouler J P, 1992, "Disciplinary society and the myth of aesthetic justice: the ideology of architectural review", in International Symposium on Design Review Eds B Lightner, W Preiser, School of Architecture and Interior Design, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, pp 223-234
36. Riotte R J, Fabos J, Zube E H, 1975, "Model of evaluation of the visual-cultural resources of the Southeastern New England Region", in Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions, and Resources Eds E H Zube, R O Rush, J Fabos (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsbourg, PA) pp 254-273
37. Rittel H W, Webber M M, 1973, "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning" Policy Sciences 4 155-169
38. Rowlett B A, 1981, "Aesthetic regulation under the police power: the new general welfare and the presumption of constitutionality" Vanderbilt Law Review 35 603-651
39. Sancar F H, 1992, "Design review: underlying assumptions on substance and process", in International Symposium on Design Review Eds B Lightner, W Preiser, School of Architecture and Interior Design, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, pp 115-132
40. Sancar F H, 1993, "An integrative approach to public participation and knowledge generation in design" Landscape and Urban Planning 26 67-88
41. Sancar F H, 1994, "Paradigms of postmodernity and implications for planning and design review processes" Environment and Behavior 26 312-337
42. Sancar F H, Macari H, Barman T, Sargin G, Onaran K, 1992, "New visions the Kickapoo: regional design proposal for future development", unpublished report, Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; copy available from F H Sancar
43. Schuck P, 1986, "The role of judges in settling complex cases: the Agent Orange example" University of Chicago Law Review 53 337-365
44. Shapiro M, 1981 Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
45. Smith W R, 1973, "A theoretical basis for participatory planning" Policy Sciences 4 247-295
46. Taylor N, 1984, "A critique of materialist critiques of procedural planning theory" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 11 102-126
47. Thorne J F, Huang C S, 1991, "Towards a landscape ecological aesthetic: methodologies for designers and planners" Landscape and Urban Planning 21 61-79
48. Trancik R, 1987 Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York)
49. Weaver C, Jessop J, Das V, 1985, "Rationality in the public interest: notes towards a new synthesis", in Rationality in Planning: Critical Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning Eds M Breheny, A Hooper (Pion, London) pp 145-165
50. Weber M, 1954 Law in Economy and Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
51. White W, 1989 City: Reconstructing the Center (Anchor Books, Garden City, New York)