Contraceptive use: The US perspective

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 62, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1998, Pages

  Burnhill, M S ^a  

^a Planned Parenthood Fed of Amer I ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Contraception; US contraceptive methods

Indexed keywords

MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; SPERMICIDAL AGENT;

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDOM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRACEPTION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG IMPLANT; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031662176     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00085-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. US Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States. 115th ed. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Census, 1995.
2. Harlap S, Kost K, Forrest JD. Preventing pregnancy, protecting health: a new look at birth control choices in the United States. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1991.
3. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F et al. Emergency contraception: postcoital options. In: Contraceptive Technology. 16th ed. New York: Imington Publishers, 1996.
4. Ortho Birth Control Study. Methods of contraception: 18-24-year-old women, 1996.
5. Abma J, Chandra A, Mosher W, Peterson L, Piccinino L. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1997;23(19).
6. Trussell J, Leveque JA, Koenig JD, London R, Borden S, Henneberry J. The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods. Am J Public Health 1995;85:494-503.
7. Newton JR, D'Arcangues C, Hall PE. 'Once-a-month' combined injectable contraceptives. J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;14:S1-S34.