A bedside test to determine motion stereopsis using the Pulfrich phenomenon

Ophthalmology

Volumn 105, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1337-1344

  Mojon, Daniel S ^a   Rösler, Kai M ^a   Oetliker, Hans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; INTEROCULAR TRANSFER; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 0031659806     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)97044-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Pulfrich C. Die Stereoskopie im Dienste der isochromen und heterochromen Photometrie. Naturwissenschaften (Berlin) 1922;10:553-64; 569-74;596-601;714-22;735-43; 751-61.
2. Weale RA. Theory of the Pulfrich effect. Ophthalmologica 1954;128:380-8.
3. Lit A. The magnitude of the PP as a function of binocular differences of intensity at various levels of illumination. Am J Psychol 1949;62:159-81.
4. Burr DC, Ross J. How does binocular delay give information about depth? Vision Res 1979;19:523-32.
5. Julesz B, White B. Short term visual memory and the Pulfrich phenomenon. Nature 1969;222:639-41.
6. Lit A. The magnitude of the PP as a function of target velocity. J Exp Psychol 1960;59:165-75.
7. Williams JM, Lit A. Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Res 1983;23:171-9.
8. Carney T, Paradiso MA, Freeman RD. A physiological correlate of the Pulfrich effect in cortical neurons of the cat. Vision Res 1989;29:155-65.
9. Vaughan HG Jr, Hull RC. Functional relation between stimulus intensity and photically evoked cerebral responses in man. Nature 1965;206:720-2.
10. Lit A, Hyman A. The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of distance of observation. American Journal of Optometry and Archives at American Academy at Optometry 1951;28:564-80.
11. Burde RM, Gallin PF. Visual parameters associated with recovered retrobulbar optic neuritis. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;79:1034-7.
12. Frisen L, Hoyt WF, Bird AC, Weale RA. Diagnostic uses of the Pulfrich phenomenon. Lancet 1973;2:385-6.
13. Grimsdale HA. Note on Pulfrich's phenomenon with a suggestion on its possible clinical importance. Br J Ophthalmol 1925;9:63-5.
14. Larkin EB, Dutton GN, Heron G. Impaired perception of moving objects after minor injuries to the eyes and midface: the Pulfrich phenomenon. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;32:360-2.
15. Rushton D. Use of the Pulfrich pendulum for detecting abnormal delay in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1975;98:283-96.
16. Slagsvold JE. Pulfrich pendulum phenomenon in patients with a history of acute optic neuritis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1978;56:817-26.
17. Wist ER, Hennerici M, Dichgans J. The Pulfrich spatial frequency phenomenon: a psychophysical method competitive to visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:1069-77.
18. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1972;1:982-5.
19. Bishara S, Zelikowitch A. Pulfrich's phenomenon and drusen of optic nerve head. Ann Ophthalmol 1984;16:27-9.
20. Lanthony P. Le phénomène de Pulfrich. J Fr Ophthalmol 1984;7:575-87.
21. Feinsod M, Bentin S, Hoyt WF. Pseudostereoscopic illusion caused by interhemispheric temporal disparity: clinical and experimental observations. Arch Neurol 1979;36:666-8.
22. Tredici TD, von Noorden GK. The Pulfrich effect in anisometropic amblyopia and strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:499-503.
23. Remky H. Das Pulfrich-Phänomen bei organischen und funktionellen Leitungsstörungen der visuellen Wahrnehmungsbahn [Eng Abstr]. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1983;79: 539-41.
24. Hofeldt AJ, Leavitt J, Behrens MM. Pulfrich stereo-illusion phenomenon in serous sensory retinal detachment of the macula. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;100:576-80.
25. Mawas E. Le Point de Vue du Néoimplantateur. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1979;174:885-90.
26. Miles PW. The Pulfrich stereo-effect produced by monocular magnification without reducing illumination. Am J Ophthalmol 1953;36:240-3.
27. Gramberg-Danielsen B. Ursachen des Pulfrich-Phänomens und seine Bedeutung im Strassenverkehr. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1963;142:738-42.
28. Siebeck R. Praktische Bedeutung der Raumsïnnstörung en durch Anisokorie. Klin Monatsbl Auenheilkd 1953;123: 86-9.
29. Wertenbaker C, Gutman I. Unusual visual symptoms. Surv Ophthalmol 1985;29:297-9.
30. Heron G, Dutton GN. The Pulfrich phenomenon and its alleviation with a neutral density filter. Br J Ophthalmol 1989;73:1004-8.
31. Mojon D, Zhang W, Oetliker M, Oetliker H. Psychophysical determination of visual processing time by comparing depth seen in Pulfrich and Mach-Dvorak illusions. Am J Physiol 1994;267 (6 Pt 3):554-64.
32. Lit A. Magnitude of the PP as a function of target thickness. J Opt Soc Am 1959;50:321-7.
33. Standing LG, Dodwell PC, Lang D. Dark adaptation and the Pulfrich effect. Percept Psychophys 1968;4:118-21.