Recognition of partially-folded mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase by GroEL. Steady and time-dependent emission anisotropy measurements

Protein Science

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 2587-2594

  Churchich, Jorge E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Fluorescence spectroscopy; GroEL; Partially folded mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase; Protein protein interaction; Time dependent emission anisotropy

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE (DECARBOXYLATING);

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME LOCALIZATION; ENZYME STRUCTURE; MITOCHONDRION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 0031648861     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560071212     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Braig K, Otwinowski Z, Hedge R, Boisvert DC, Joachimiak A, Horwich AL, Sigler PB. 1994. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371:578-586.
2. Chen YH, Yang JT, Martinez HM. 1972. Determination of the secondary structures of globular proteins by optical rotary dispension and circular dichroism. Biochemistry 11:4120-4131.
3. Churchich JE. 1993. Fluorescent properties of O-aminobenzoyl-labeled proteins. Analyt Biochemistry 213:229-233.
4. Churchich JE. 1997. Conformational changes at the nucleotide binding of GroEL induced by binding of protein substrates. J Biol Chem 272:19645-19648.
5. Gleason WB, Fu Z, Birktoft J, Banaszak L. 1994. Refined crystal structure of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase from porcine heart and the consensus structure of bicarboxylic acid oxidoreductases. Biochemistry 33:2078-2088.
6. Goloubinoff P, Gatenby AA, Lorimer GH. 1994. GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribulose biphosphate carboxylase oligomers in Escherichia coli. Nature 337:44-47.
7. Gross M, Robinson CV, Mayhew M, Hartl FU, Radford SE. 1996. Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL-bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling. Protein Sci 5:2506-2512.
8. Hutchinson JP, Elthaner TSH, Miller AD. 1994. Refolding and recognition of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase by Escherichia coli chaperonins. GroEL and GroES. Biochem J 302:405-410.
9. Kwon Oh-S, Churchich JE. 1994. Interaction of 70-kDa heat shock cognate protein with peptides and myo-inositol monophosphatase. J Biol Chem 269:266-271.
10. Li W, Churchich JE. 1997. Activation of partially-folded mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase by thioredoxin. Eur J Biochem 246:127-132.
11. Makino Y, Taguchi H, Yoshida M. 1993. Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP. FEBS Lett 336:363-367.
12. Peralta D, Hartman DJ, Hoogenraad NJ, Hoj PB. 1994. Generation of a stable folding intermediate which can be rescued by the chaperonins GroEL and GroES. FEBS Lett 339:45-49.
13. Ptitsyn O. 1995. Adv Protein Chem 47:83-229.
14. Robinson CV, Grob M, Eyles SJ, Eubank JJ, Mayhew M, Hartl FU, Dobson CM, Radford SE. 1994. Conformation of GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. Nature 372:646-651.
15. Staniforth RA, Cortes A, Burston SG, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ, Clarke AR. 1994. The stability and hydrophobicity of cystolic and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase and their relation to chaperonin-assisted folding. FEBS Lett 344:129-135.
16. Vitanen PV, Gatenby AA, Lorimer GH. 1992. Purified GroEL interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci 1:363-369.
17. Wahl P. 1979. Analysis of fluorescence anisotropy decays by a least square method. Biophys Chem 10:91-104.