The capabilities of upper extremity instrument: Reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 79, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1512-1521

  Marino, Ralph J ^a,b   Shea, Judy A ^a   Stineman, Margaret G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; QUADRIPLEGIA; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SPINAL CORD INJURY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0031648593     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90412-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. NIH pub 93-3509. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 1993.
2. Fisher AG. Functional measures, part 2: selecting the right test, minimizing the limitations. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:278-81.
3. Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarlov AR, editors. Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1991. p. 309-27.
4. Marino RJ, Stineman MG. Functional assessment in spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1996;1:32-45.
5. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980.
6. Pope AM, Tarlov AR, editors. Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1991.
7. Guccione AA. Physical therapy diagnosis and the relationship between impairments and function. Phys Ther 1991;71:499-504.
8. MacKenzie EJ, Damiano A, Miller T, Luchter S. The development of the Functional Capacity Index. Trauma 1996;41:799-807.
9. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969;50:311-9.
10. Wuolle KS, Van Doren CL, Thorpe GB, Keith MW, Peckham PH. Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:209-18.
11. Weiner DK, Bongiorni DR, Studenski SA, Duncan PW, Kochersberger GG. Does functional reach improve with rehabilitation? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:796-800.
12. Jette AM. Functional Status Index: reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980;61:395-401.
13. American Spinal Injury Association. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury, revised 1992. Chicago: American Spinal Injury Association; 1992.
14. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, et al. The value of postural reduction in initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969-70;7:179-92.
15. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM), Version 4.0. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York at Buffalo; 1993.
16. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-32.
17. Ditunno JF Jr, Cohen MA, Formal C, Whiteneck GG. Functional outcomes. In: Stover SL, Whiteneck GG, DeLisa JA, editors. Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the Model Systems. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen; 1995. p. 170-84.
18. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8.
19. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
20. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
21. Nunnally JC Jr. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
23. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Controlled Clinical Trials 1991;12: 142S-58S.
24. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
25. Guilford JP, Fruchter B. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
26. Kirshner B, Guyatt G: A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis 1985;38:27-36.
27. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1226-32.
28. Gerhart KA, Bergstrom E, Charlifue S, Menter RR, Whiteneck GG. Long-term spinal cord injury: functional changes over time. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1030-4.
29. Menter RR, Hudson LM. Effects of age at injury and the aging process. In: Stover SL, Whiteneck GG, DeLisa JA, editors. Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the Model Systems. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen; 1995. p. 272-88.
30. Whiteneck GG. Outcome evaluation and spinal cord injury. Neurol Rehabil 1992;2:31-41.
31. Dorevitch MI, Cossar RM, Bailey FJ, Bisset T, Lewis SJ, Wise LA, et al. The accuracy of self and informant ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:791-8.
32. McGinnes GE, Seward ML, DeJong G, Osberg JS. Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self-report Barthel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:123-5.
33. Skruppy M. Activities of daily living evaluations: is there a difference in what the patient reports and what is observed? Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 1993;11:13-25.