Gradual deformation of continuous geostatistical models for history matching

Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

Volumn 1999-September, Issue , 1998, Pages 221-236

  Roggero, F ^a   Hu, L Y ^a,b  

^a IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES   (France)

^b Helios Reservoir Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; DEFORMATION; GRADIENT METHODS; OIL WELLS; OPTIMIZATION; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; WELL TESTING; ALGORITHMS; HISTORY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PETROLEUM GEOLOGY; PRESSURE; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICAL METHODS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

AUTOMATIC HISTORY MATCHING; GEOSTATISTICAL MODELING; GEOSTATISTICAL MODELS; HISTORICAL PRODUCTION; NUMBER OF ITERATIONS; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL UNCERTAINTY;

STOCHASTIC MODELS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

GEOSTATISTICAL MODELS; GRADUAL DEFORMATION; HISTORY MATCHING;

EID: 0031646020     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2118/49004-ms     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Deutch, C.: "Conditioning reservoir models to well test information", in Soares, A. (ed.), Geostatistics Troia'92, pp. 505-518, Kluwer Academic Pub., 1993.
2. Hegstad, B.K., Omre, H., Tjelmeland, H. and Tyler, K.: "Stochastic simulation and conditioning by annealing in reservoir description", in Armstrong, M. and Dowd, P. (eds.), Geostatistical simulations, pp. 43-55, Kluwer Academic Pub., 1994.
3. Mitchell, M.: "An introduction to genetic algorithms", The MIT Press, 1996.
4. Alabert, F.: "Constraining description of randomly heterogeneous reservoirs to pressume test data: a Monte Carlo study", paper SPE 19600 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, October 1989.
5. Oliver, D.S., Cunha, L.B. and Reynolds, A.C.: "Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data", Math. Geology, 29(1)61-91, 1997.
6. Marsily de, G. and others: "Interpretation of interference tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model", in Verly, G. et al. (ed.), Geostatistics for natural ressources characterization, Part 2, 831-849, D. Reidel Pub. Company, 1984.
7. Wen, X.H., Deutsch, C.V., Cullick, A.S.: "High resolution Reservoir Models Integrating Multiple-Well Production Data", paper SPE 38728 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, October 1989.
8. Bissell, R.C., Dubrule, O., Lamy, P., Swaby, P., and Lepine, O.: "Combining Geostatistical Modelling With Gradient Information for History Matching: The Pilot Point Method", paper SPE 38730 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, October 1989.
9. Roggero, F.: "Direct Selection of Stochastic Model Realizations Constrained to Historical Data", paper SPE 38731 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, October 1989.
10. Hu, L.Y. and Helios Reservoir Group: "Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of Gaussian-related stochastic models", paper submitted to Mathematical Geology, 1998.
11. Anterion, F., Eymard, R., Karcher, B.: "Use of Parameter Gradients for Reservoir History Matching", SPE18433, Houston, TX, 6-8 Feb. 1989.
12. Rahon, D., Blanc, G., Guérillot, D.: "Gradients Method Constrained by Geological Bodies for History Matching", SPE 36568, enver, Colorado, 6-9 October 1996.
13. th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Leoben, Austria, 3-6 Sept. 1996.
14. th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Peebles, Scotland, 8-11 Sept. 1998.