INVESTIGATIONS OF DENT REROUNDING BEHAVIOR

Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference, IPC

Volumn 2, Issue , 1998, Pages 299-307

  Rosenfeld, Michael J ^a  

^a Kiefner and Associates Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT ENGINES; GAS TURBINES; FATIGUE TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

DENTED PIPES; MEASURED PARAMETERS; MECHANICAL DAMAGES; MODEL SET; PLAIN DENTS; PRESSURE CYCLES; STRUCTURAL BEHAVIORS; THEORETICAL MODELING;

FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; PIPELINES;

DENT REROUNDING;

EID: 0031637816     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/IPC1998-2036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Corder, I., and Corbin, P., 1991, “The Resistance of Buried Pressurised Pipelines to outside Force Damage, " 8thEPRG/NG-18 Joint Technical Meeting, Paris.
2. Eiber, R. J., et al, 1981, "The Effects of Dents on the Failure Characteristics of Line Pipe, " NG-18 Report No. 125, Cat. No. L51403, May.
3. Fowler, J. R., et al, 1993, "Criteria for Dent Acceptability of Offshore Pipelines, " OTC 7311, Offshore Tech. Conf., Houston.
4. Fowler, J. R., et al, 1994, "Cyclic Pressure Fatigue Life of Pipelines With Plain Dents, Dents With Gouges, and Dents With Welds, " Report to Pipeline Res. Comm., PR-201-927 and PR-201-9324.
5. Haigh, B.P., 1936, "An Estimate of the Bending Stresses Induced by Pressure in a Tube That is Not Initially Quite Circular", 2ndRept. of the Welding Res. Comm., App. IX, Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., vol. 133, pp. 96-98.
6. Hopkins, P., Corder, I., and Corbin, P., 1992, “The Resistance of Gas Transmission Pipelines to Mechanical Damage, ” CANMET Inti. Conf. on Pipeline Reliability, Calgary.
7. Jones, D. G., and Hopkins, P., 1983, “The Influence of Mechanical Damage on Transmission Pipeline Integrity, ” Inti. Gas Res. Conf., London.
8. Jones, D. G., 1982, “The Significance of Mechanical Damage in Pipelines, ” 3R Inti., July.
9. Kilpi, J., "The Effect o f Out-of-Roundness in a Pressure Vessel on Stresses and Change of Shape, with Special Reference to a Cellulose Digester", 1959, VDI Zeitschrift, vol. 101.
10. Laasonen, P., 1955, "Problems Connected with the Strength of Sulphite Cellulose Digesters", reported in Kilpi (1959).
11. Lancaster, E. R., and Palmer, S. C., 1992, "Model Testing of Mechanically Damaged Pipes Containing Combined Dents and Gouges, " ASME PVP Conf., New Orleans.
12. Langer, B. F., 1964, "PVRC Interpretive Report of Pressure Vessel Research, " WRC Bulletin 95.
13. Leis, B. N., et al, 1986, "Prediction of Inelastic Crack Growth in Ductile Line Pipe", PRC, 7th Symp. on Line Pipe Res., Houston.
14. Maxey, W. A., 1986, "Outside Force Defect Behavior, " NG-18 Report No. 162, A.G.A., Cat. No. L51518.
15. Mitchell, M. R., 1979, "Fundamentals o f Modem Fatigue Analysis for Design", Fatigue and Microstructure. ASM.
16. Muntinga, T., and Koning, C., 1990, "Verification of External Damage Models by Burst Tests on Pipe Sections, " Pipeline Tech. Conf., Ostende, Belgium.
17. Schmidt, K., 1960, "Stress in an Out-of-Round Pressure Vessel", VDI Zeitschrift, vol. 102.
18. Spiekhout, J., et al, 1985, “The Influence of Pipewall Thickness on Resistance to Damage of Gas Transmission Pipelines, " 6lhEPRG/NG-18 Joint Tech. Mtg., Camogli, Italy.
19. Tucker, L. E., et al, 1974, “Proposed Technical Report on Fatigue Properties for the SAE Handbook, ” SAE Report 740279, Automotive Engineering Congress.
20. Williams, D. N., and Elsea, A. R., 1977, "Studies of the Bauschinger Effect in Pipe Steels", A.G.A. NG-18 Rep. No. 108.