Dynamical properties of low-dimensional CuGeO3 and NaV2O5 spin-Peierls systems

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 19-28

  Augier, D ^a   Poilblanc, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

64.70.Kb Solid solid transitions; 71.27.+a Strongly correlated electron systems; heavy fermions; 75.10.Jm Quantized spin models

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETISM; GERMANIUM COMPOUNDS; NEUTRON SCATTERING; OXIDES; PHONONS; VANADIUM COMPOUNDS;

MAGNONS; SPIN-PEIERLS SYSTEMS;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0031621643     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100510050148     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. M. Hase, I. Terasaki, K. Uchinokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3651 (1993).
2. M. Isobe, Y. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 65, 1178 (1996).
3. Y. Fujii et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 66, 326 (1997).
4. T. Ohama, M. Isobe, H. Yasuoka, Y. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 66, 545 (1997).
5. M. Weiden, R. Hauptmann, C. Geibel, F. Steglich, M. Fischer, P. Lemmens, G. Güntherodt, preprint cond-mat/9703052.
6. J.P. Pouget et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4037 (1994); Q.J. Harris et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 12 606 (1994).
7. J.P. Pouget et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4037 (1994); Q.J. Harris et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 12 606 (1994).
8. J. Riera, A. Dobry, Phys. Rev. B 51, 16098 (1995).
9. G. Castilla, S. Chakravarty, V.J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1823 (1995)
10. J. Riera, S. Koval, Phys. Rev. B 53, 770 (1996).
11. G. Bouzerar, A.P. Kampf, F. Schönfeld, preprint cond-mat/9701176.
12. F. Mila, P. Millet, J. Bonvoisin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11 925 (1996).
13. M. Nishi, O. Fujita, J. Akimitsu, Phys. Rev. B 50, 6508 (1994).
14. L.P. Regnault, M. Aïn, B. Hennion, G. Dhalenne, A. Revcolevschi, Phys. Rev. B 53, 5579 (1996).
15. M. Itoh, M. Sugahara, T. Yamauchi, Y. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 53, 11 606 (1996).
16. F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4925 (1982).
17. K. Okamoto, K. Nomura, Phys. Lett. A 169, 433 (1992).
18. D. Augier, D. Poilblanc, S. Haas, A. Delia, E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 56, R5732 (1997).
19. S. Haas, E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 52, R14396 (1995).
20. D. Poilblanc, J. Riera, C.A. Hayward, C. Berthier, M. Hortavić, Phys. Rev. B 55, R11 941 (1997).
21. V.N. Muthukumar et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, R9635 (1996).
22. U. Brandt, H. Leschke, Z. Phys. 271, 295 (1974); see also K. Hepp, E.H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. A8, 2517 (1973).
23. U. Brandt, H. Leschke, Z. Phys. 271, 295 (1974); see also K. Hepp, E.H. Lieb, Phys. Rev. A8, 2517 (1973).
24. Multiple phonons have been considered in related models of correlated electrons by e.g. R. Fehrenbacher, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 230 (1994), G. Wellein, H. Röder, H. Fehske, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9666 (1996) in one, two dimensions respectively.
25. Multiple phonons have been considered in related models of correlated electrons by e.g. R. Fehrenbacher, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 230 (1994), G. Wellein, H. Röder, H. Fehske, Phys. Rev. B 53, 9666 (1996) in one, two dimensions respectively.
26. G.S. Uhrig, H.J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B 54, R9624 (1996); for a discussion on soliton confinement see e.g. I. Affleck, preprint cond-mat/9705127.
27. G.S. Uhrig, H.J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B 54, R9624 (1996); for a discussion on soliton confinement see e.g. I. Affleck, preprint cond-mat/9705127.
28. A. Fledderjohann, C. Gros, Europhys. Lett. 37, 189 (1997).
29. A detailed review on electron-phonon interaction in one-dimensional correlated electron systems can be found in "One-dimensional Fermi liquids", J. Voit, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 977 (1995).
30. W. Stephan, M. Capone, M. Grilli, C. Castellani, preprint cond-mat/9605164; D. Khomskii, W. Geerstma, M. Mostovoy, Czech. Journ. Phys. 46, Suppl. S6, 32 (1996).
31. W. Stephan, M. Capone, M. Grilli, C. Castellani, preprint cond-mat/9605164; D. Khomskii, W. Geerstma, M. Mostovoy, Czech. Journ. Phys. 46, Suppl. S6, 32 (1996).
32. T. Tonegawa, I. Harada, J. Soc. Jpn 56, 2153 (1987).
33. R. Chitra, S. Pati, H.R. Krishnamurthy, D. Sen, S. Ramasesha, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6581 (1995).
34. In two dimensional systems, similar approaches can be found e.g. in A. Dobry, A. Greco, S. Koval, J. Riera, Phys. Rev. B 52, 13 722 (1995); Poilblanc, T. Sakai, W. Hanke, D.J. Scalapino, Europhys. Lett. 34, 367 (1996).
35. In two dimensional systems, similar approaches can be found e.g. in A. Dobry, A. Greco, S. Koval, J. Riera, Phys. Rev. B 52, 13 722 (1995); Poilblanc, T. Sakai, W. Hanke, D.J. Scalapino, Europhys. Lett. 34, 367 (1996).
36. S. Capponi, N. Guihéry, J.-P. Malrieu, B. Miguel, D. Poilblanc, Chem. Phys. Lett. 255, 238 (1996); for models with no electronic correlations see W.P. Su, J.R. Schrieffer, A.J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
37. S. Capponi, N. Guihéry, J.-P. Malrieu, B. Miguel, D. Poilblanc, Chem. Phys. Lett. 255, 238 (1996); for models with no electronic correlations see W.P. Su, J.R. Schrieffer, A.J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
38. The equivalence has been rigorously established by reference [21] for the Fröhlich Hamiltonian, should be also exact for model (2) which includes correlations between electrons.
39. To the best of our knowledge, no proof exists that dynamical correlations should be identical.
40. For a review on numerical methods based on the Lanczos algorithm, see e.g. "Exact diagonalisation methods for models of strongly correlated fermions", D. Poilblanc in Numerical methods for strongly correlated systems, edited by D.J. Scalapino (Frontiers in physics, 1997).
41. H. Frahm, V.E. Korepin, Phys. Rev. B 42, 10 553 (1990).
42. M.N. Barber, in Phase transitions, critical phenomena, edited by C. Domb, J.L. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1983) Vol. 8.
43. For the static model (3), chains with up to L = 28 sites were considered.
44. The second singlet double-magnon excitation energy is roughly twice larger than the first triplet excitation (for more details see e.g. [17]). However, singlet phononic excitations may lie below the continuum.
45. J. Des Cloiseaux, J.J. Pearson, Phys. Rev. 128, 2131 (1962).
46. M. Aïn, J.E. Lorenzo, L.P. Regnault, G. Dhalenne, A. Revcolevschi, B. Hennion, Th. Jolicoeur, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 1560 (1997).
47. As can be seen e.g. in the finite size extrapolations of the triplet excitations energies at q = π/2. In contrast, in the static model (3), the computed data [19, 17] are almost indistinguishable from the extrapolated values.