DPOAE modifications induced by pure tone overstimulation in guinea pigs

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 27, Issue 48, 1998, Pages 37-43

  Cianfrone, Giancarlo ^a   Ingrosso, Angelo ^b   Altissimi, Giancarlo ^a   Ralli, Giovanni ^a   Turchetta, Rosaria ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b AIRS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cochlear vulnerability; Distortion product; Guinea pig; Noise exposition; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FILTER; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; STIMULATION; ANIMAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; COCHLEA; GUINEA PIGS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031606831     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brown AM, Kemp DT: Suppressibility of the 2fl-f2 stimulated acoustic emission in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29-37.
2. Cianfrone G, Altissimi G, Brenna E, Cervellini M, Cusano L, Fabbricatore MA, Ingrosso A, Maiolo A, Mattia GM, Musacchio A, Petti R, Ralli G, Trenta M Triches L, Turchetta R: Il rumore e le emissioni otoacustiche. In: Quaranta A, Arshan E, Ambrosi L, Henderson D, eds. La sordità da rumore, Bari: Ecumenica Editrice 1995; 119-49.
3. Cianfrone E, marria M, Cervellini M, Musacchio A: Same effects of tonale fatiguing on spontaneous and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 123-30.
4. Clark WW, Kim DO, Zurek PM, Bohne BA: Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ears: correlations with histopathology and suppression by external tones. Hear Res, 1984; 16: 299-314.
5. Collet L, Grandori F, eds.: Suppression effects of otoacoustic emissions. Advances in Otoacoustic emissions, 1994; Vol. III.
6. Dolan TG, Abbas PJ: Changes in the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission anche whole-nerve response following sound exposure: long term effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 83: 1475-83.
7. Franklin DJ, Lonsboury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Martin GK: Altered susceptibility of 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res 1991; 53: 185-208.
8. Kemp DT: Cochlear echoes: Implications for noise-induced hearing loss. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, eds. New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven Press 1982: 189-207.
9. Koppl C, Manley GA: Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II: Suppression tuning characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 2834-44.
10. Lonsboury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Probst R, Coats AC: Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res 1987; 28: 173-89.
11. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Probst R, Coats AC: Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear Res 1988; 33: 69-93.
12. Martin GK, Probst R, Scheinin SA, Coats AC, Lonsboury-Martin BL: Acoustic distortion products in rabbits. II Sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191-208.
13. Mott JB, Norton SJ, Neely ST, Warr WB: Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the controlateral ear. Hear Res 1989; 38: 229-42.
14. Norton SJ, Mott JB, Champlin CA: Behavoir of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1989; 38: 243-58.
15. Quaranta A: Otoemissioni Acustiche Evocate Ritardate: nella senescenza e nel trauma acustico cronico. Audiologia Italiana 1989; 6: 187-9.
16. Zurek PM, Clark WW: Narrow-band acoustic signals emitted by chinchilla ears after noise exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70, 446-5.
17. Whitehead ML, Lonsboury-Martin BL, Martin GK: Relevance of animal models to the clinical application of otoacoustic emissions. Seminars in Hearing 1992; 1: 81-101.