|
Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 8-28
|
Trial of labour versus elective repeat caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
CESAREAN SECTION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP;
ECONOMICS;
FEMALE;
HOSPITAL COST;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
STATISTICS;
TRIAL OF LABOR;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
AUSTRALIA;
CESAREAN SECTION;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS;
FEMALE;
HOSPITAL COSTS;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TRIAL OF LABOR;
|
EID: 0031603641
PISSN: 01565788
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1071/AH980008 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (0)
|